LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 119
0 members and 119 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 01-23-2004, 06:05 PM   #4739
sgtclub
Serenity Now
 
sgtclub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Survivor Island
Posts: 7,007
Yeah, the GOP is all about states' rights in overturning RvW.

Quote:
Originally posted by Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)
because they can be given up for adoption at that point. unless you believe that society has the right to impose temporary involuntary servitude, the difference is relevant.
I don't see how this is relevant, or how the viability test is justifyable. We are using viability as the dividing line between the rights at issue, right? Pre-viability, the woman's right to chose outweighs the fetus' (or whatever the technical term is) rights. But what is so significant about viability? The fact that the fetus no longer needs to be stuck to the mother's uterous to survive means what? And why is that different than having a tube down it's throat in the ICU?
sgtclub is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:46 PM.