LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 120
0 members and 120 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 01-23-2004, 06:27 PM   #4751
Not Me
Too Lazy to Google
 
Not Me's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 4,460
Yeah, the GOP is all about states' rights in overturning RvW.

Quote:
Originally posted by Tyrone_Slothrop
But one could also see permitting "abortions" in the first few days, on the theory that a just-conceived embryo really isn't sufficiently like a person to warrant protection.
I know that is your theory, that a just-conceived embryo really isn't sufficiently like a person to warrant protection. However, what I have yet to hear explained is how you arrived at that theory. Why is an embryo not sufficiently like a person to warrant protection. What is it that makes a being sufficiently like a person to warrant protection?

And why is viability the line at which a fetus becomes sufficiently like a person to warrant protection? What is so special about viability that it tips the scales in favor of the fetus rights? Oh wait, scratch that, it is the particular person/involuntary servitude thing. Sorry, I forgot. I was distracted momentarily by all the pretty colored marshmallows floating in my cereal.
__________________
IRL I'm Charming.
Not Me is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:47 PM.