Quote:
Originally posted by sgtclub
I think you are right that this is a difficult issue and one on which I have never been able to reach a decision. So I just ask questions like why do we, in this case, error on the side of "death*" rather than life, while in all other cases we chose life?
*for lack of a better word.
|
And at what point do we decide not to impose "our" judgment and to let others decide.
I generally believe that there should be more restrictive provisions, and that the balance has been struck too late. And then the debate starts, and I find the choice of more restrictive but not aboslute is not going to be permitted.
I'm heading out. BRC has my proxy.
