Quote:
Originally posted by robustpuppy
A recent study in Jama says it's harder to detect breast cancer through mammography when a woman has implants. So the local news covers the story, and opens with stock footage of womens' boobs, mostly in bikini tops, many of which are obviously not implants, and some of which are. This footage, while ridiculous, is vastly preferable to the stock footage of the abdomens and behinds of overweight people, which they always trot out for the latest story on the obesity epidemic or the death of Dr. Atkins or the Southwest Airlines policy.
The stock footage of body parts always makes me wonder whether the mere fact that the person's face isn't shown means the person has no control over the use of images of his or her body. Anybody?
|
timely question! remember breasticle day? Well Pretty Little Flower used his moderator position to download one of the photos- who knew leagl shouldn't have trusted him? He is selling it on the internet, plus at lunch hour on the streets of Minneapolis.
It was the one photo, you know. Well when ncs found out- she brought a lawsuit "for a friend." she's asking for a writ of "hocus pocus." hearing is set for Thursday AM!
