infinitytrack
Moving On Up
Joined: 10 Mar 2003
Posts: 18
Posted: Fri Mar 14, 2003 3:14 pm__ _Post subject:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Quote:
and to the gentleman suggesting the option of bralessness, I appreciate his sentiment
Get your mind out of the gutter. I never suggested any such thing. rather, you could forego tanktops entirely and opt for baggy sweaters.Back to top
_
ThurgreedMarshall
[Intentionally Omitted]
Joined: 10 Mar 2003
Posts: 109
Location: New York fuckin' City
Posted: Fri Mar 14, 2003 3:15 pm__ _Post subject: Now who hasn't wanted to do this?
------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.nydailynews.com/front/bre...4p-62534c.html
Flight attendant drugs a toddler's apple juice to shut em up.
TMBack to top
_
infinitytrack
Moving On Up
Joined: 10 Mar 2003
Posts: 18
Posted: Fri Mar 14, 2003 3:17 pm__ _Post subject:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
I saw that article. I've contemplated using that method with the baby 8Track many times. Although, it's a bit presumptuous to offer it to someone else's kid.
Big lawsuit pending, I'd guess.Back to top
_
EvenOdds
Guest
Posted: Fri Mar 14, 2003 3:17 pm__ _Post subject:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
infinitytrack wrote:
Quote:
They don't have my cup size, dammit! I am condemned to show my bra straps through my tank tops like a tart forever.
There is another option that does not involve display of bra straps.
Other than going bra-less . . .
I saw a "padded-bra tank" from Express in the new issue of Real Simple. It's listed at $23 and comes in 8 colors.
I checked out the website (
www.expressfashion.com), but it is irritating and there are no page links.Back to top
_
MangoLassi
What's in a rank?
Joined: 10 Mar 2003
Posts: 64
Location: Imperial Rome
Posted: Fri Mar 14, 2003 3:18 pm__ _Post subject: Re: Now who hasn't wanted to do this?
------------------------------------------------------------------------
ThurgreedMarshall wrote:
http://www.nydailynews.com/front/bre...4p-62534c.html
Flight attendant drugs a toddler's apple juice to shut em up.
TM
This is f'ing BRILLIANT! My fantasy! (Not the being arrested part, of course.)Back to top
_
TexLex
What's in a rank?
Joined: 09 Mar 2003
Posts: 66
Location: Houston
Posted: Fri Mar 14, 2003 3:20 pm__ _Post subject: Re: Releases Gone Wild
------------------------------------------------------------------------
barely_legal wrote:
TexLex wrote:
You're right - the suit had to do that with the fact that she was too drunk to consent to appearing - I didn't hear about the release specifically, but if she was drunk, any release she signed would have been void or at least voidable.
-TL
ok, I believe you but this makes no sense. I would think that well over half of the women who appear topless on these videos are drunk as shit, so they are signing releases when then are drunk as shit, so why aren't all those leases voidable? Are most of the women too apathetic (or maybe proud to be on the video) to sue?
Perplexing isn't it? I don't know - I think this one was on one of the commercials so maybe she had higher damages since everyone in the free world saw her...um...performance? Maybe none of the girls gone wild thinks to sue. Maybe they can't come up with an expense retainer..... And yes - I think they are all drunk - flashing strangers is a lot more amusing with a few hurricanes in your gullet.
I was expecting a flurry of lawsuits after I heard about that one, but.... Maybe this was the first one who thought of it and they've silently settled with the rest. And I don't know if she actually won (other than what TM says) only that the suit was filed. But yes, if she signed an agreement without capacity to sign, then I would think she had a decent case to avoid the agreement.
I do know that if you flash people at Mardi Gras there are tons of guys with cameras and videorecorders, so I'm not sure what the "expectation of privacy" is there when it is clear you are being recorded, but the fact that your image is being used for commercial purposes probably changes things.
-TL Back to top
_
pursejunkie
What's in a rank?
Joined: 10 Mar 2003
Posts: 60
Location: playing with the dog
Posted: Fri Mar 14, 2003 3:35 pm__ _Post subject: tanks, & drugging kidlets
------------------------------------------------------------------------
ltlfb wrote:
infinitytrack wrote:
There is another option that does not involve display of bra straps.
Lecherous sadist. That can be painful. Particularly for someone who needs underwire (but, pj, if you don't, jjill has a bunch of non-underwire tanks with built in bras).
f(generally, puppies are not very robust but every once in a while I find myself wearing an immobilizing sportsbra to work)b
thanks, I like JJill's stuff, but no underwire=bouncing Jenny Jones guest (particularly not optimal for client meetings). And WTF is with this new trend of padded bras for the already-bosomy--like we want to walk into a room a half hour after our racks do?
On drugging someone else's screaming kids--does that stuff come in a handy spray-can I can tuck in my purse?Back to top
_
ltlfb
I Sure Do Post A Lot
Joined: 10 Mar 2003
Posts: 49
Posted: Fri Mar 14, 2003 3:41 pm__ _Post subject: Re: tanks, & drugging kidlets
------------------------------------------------------------------------
pursejunkie wrote:
no underwire=bouncing Jenny Jones guest (particularly not optimal for client meetings).
On drugging someone else's screaming kids--does that stuff come in a handy spray-can I can tuck in my purse?
bouncing is bad.
if you find that spray, send me a can.Back to top
_
greatwhitenorthchick
I Sure Do Post A Lot
Joined: 10 Mar 2003
Posts: 53
Location: somewhere underneath Owen Nolan
Posted: Fri Mar 14, 2003 3:47 pm__ _Post subject: Re: Now who hasn't wanted to do this?
------------------------------------------------------------------------
MangoLassi wrote:
This is f'ing BRILLIANT! My fantasy! (Not the being arrested part, of course.)
Mango, just FYI. You can swear on this board. In fact, you must - I believe it's rule 2063. The freedom to indulge in profanity is what brought us here. It's the reason Morgan, Leagl, Slave & MR stayed up all last night fixing the board. I'm sure they will be very upset if you don't reward their hard work.
[quote code fixed (looks like you deleted part of the "quote" bracket, gwnc) -- Not Bob]Back to top
_
greatwhitenorthchick
I Sure Do Post A Lot
Joined: 10 Mar 2003
Posts: 53
Location: somewhere underneath Owen Nolan
Posted: Fri Mar 14, 2003 3:50 pm__ _Post subject: Ok I've figured out emoticons
------------------------------------------------------------------------
But I have no idea how to quote. Could someone please fix the code in my post and tell me what I did wrong.Back to top
_
Replaced_Texan
I am simply a cog in the Lawtalk Machine
Joined: 10 Mar 2003
Posts: 67
Location: Deep in the heart
Posted: Fri Mar 14, 2003 3:52 pm__ _Post subject: Re: tanks, & drugging kidlets
------------------------------------------------------------------------
pursejunkie wrote:
ltlfb wrote:
infinitytrack wrote:
There is another option that does not involve display of bra straps.
Lecherous sadist. That can be painful. Particularly for someone who needs underwire (but, pj, if you don't, jjill has a bunch of non-underwire tanks with built in bras).
f(generally, puppies are not very robust but every once in a while I find myself wearing an immobilizing sportsbra to work)b
thanks, I like JJill's stuff, but no underwire=bouncing Jenny Jones guest (particularly not optimal for client meetings). And WTF is with this new trend of padded bras for the already-bosomy--like we want to walk into a room a half hour after our racks do?
On drugging someone else's screaming kids--does that stuff come in a handy spray-can I can tuck in my purse?
I was recently handed a "lined" bra with lots of what I would call padding when I loudly complained that it seems that all bras these days are padded. It should go without saying that anyone who looks at me, including and especially retailers in lingerie shops, should know that I don't need padding whether it's called lining or some other term.
I'm pretty sure that my parents used to spike juice on a regular basis when I was a kid. They had four kids under the age of six, I think they were justified if only to prevent infanticide. We used to call Creme de Menthe "medicina" when we were little.
R(went braless last weekend and felt positively naked)TBack to top
_
tmdiva
I Sure Do Post A Lot
Joined: 09 Mar 2003
Posts: 36
Location: Stumptown, USA
Posted: Fri Mar 14, 2003 3:55 pm__ _Post subject:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
I think the "lined" bras are for those who dread ever showing a hint of nipple. Frankly, I've never felt that self-conscious about it (the only person who ever mentions them--"Is it cold in here?"--is my non-self-censoring brother). I have a sister who favors them.
tmBack to top
_
MangoLassi
What's in a rank?
Joined: 10 Mar 2003
Posts: 64
Location: Imperial Rome
Posted: Fri Mar 14, 2003 3:56 pm__ _Post subject: Re: Now who hasn't wanted to do this?
------------------------------------------------------------------------
greatwhitenorthchick wrote:
MangoLassi wrote:
This is f'ing BRILLIANT! My fantasy! (Not the being arrested part, of course.)
Mango, just FYI. You can swear on this board. In fact, you must - I believe it's rule 2063. The freedom to indulge in profanity is what brought us here. It's the reason Morgan, Leagl, Slave & MR stayed up all last night fixing the board. I'm sure they will be very upset if you don't reward their hard work.
Oh, Honey, I plan to. I'm just saving it up for something really good. Back to top
_
EvenOdds
Guest
Posted: Fri Mar 14, 2003 3:56 pm__ _Post subject: Re: Ok I've figured out emoticons
------------------------------------------------------------------------
greatwhitenorthchick wrote:
But I have no idea how to quote. Could someone please fix the code in my post and tell me what I did wrong.
You missed the closing bracket next to the name after "mangolassi"].
I'd fix it but we're having a problem with local mod powers, i.e., I have none.
Last edited by EvenOdds on Fri Mar 14, 2003 3:59 pm, edited 1 time in totalBack to top
_
Replaced_Texan
I am simply a cog in the Lawtalk Machine
Joined: 10 Mar 2003
Posts: 67
Location: Deep in the heart
Posted: Fri Mar 14, 2003 3:56 pm__ _Post subject: Re: Now who hasn't wanted to do this?
------------------------------------------------------------------------
greatwhitenorthchick wrote:
MangoLassi wrote:
This is f'ing BRILLIANT! My fantasy! (Not the being arrested part, of course.)
Mango, just FYI. You can swear on this board. In fact, you must - I believe it's rule 2063. The freedom to indulge in profanity is what brought us here. It's the reason Morgan, Leagl, Slave & MR stayed up all last night fixing the board. I'm sure they will be very upset if you don't reward their hard work.
[fixed a tag--RT, The {quote="mangoLassi part should have had a "] at the end]Back to top
_
Replaced_Texan
I am simply a cog in the Lawtalk Machine
Joined: 10 Mar 2003
Posts: 67
Location: Deep in the heart
Posted: Fri Mar 14, 2003 3:58 pm__ _Post subject:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
whoops, I thought I was editing, but i posted instead....looks like our mod editing powers are on hiatus right now.Back to top
_
bold_n_brazen
I Sure Do Post A Lot
Joined: 10 Mar 2003
Posts: 51
Location: At the Gas n' Sip
Posted: Fri Mar 14, 2003 3:59 pm__ _Post subject:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
This is the best fucking emoticon I've ever seen in my life.
I love this new board.
Bn'BBack to top
_
bold_n_brazen
I Sure Do Post A Lot
Joined: 10 Mar 2003
Posts: 51
Location: At the Gas n' Sip
Posted: Fri Mar 14, 2003 4:00 pm__ _Post subject:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
tmdiva wrote:
I think the "lined" bras are for those who dread ever showing a hint of nipple. Frankly, I've never felt that self-conscious about it (the only person who ever mentions them--"Is it cold in here?"--is my non-self-censoring brother). I have a sister who favors them.
tm
Your sister favors a hint of nipple? She'd be very popular round here...
Bn'BBack to top
_
Replaced_Texan
I am simply a cog in the Lawtalk Machine
Joined: 10 Mar 2003
Posts: 67
Location: Deep in the heart
Posted: Fri Mar 14, 2003 4:00 pm__ _Post subject:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out
http://www.mysmilies.com/ for an unbelievable amount of emoticons of all shapes and sizes. Pretty much every occassion you could think of is covered there.Back to top
_
pursejunkie
What's in a rank?
Joined: 10 Mar 2003
Posts: 60
Location: playing with the dog
Posted: Fri Mar 14, 2003 4:01 pm__ _Post subject: Re: tanks, & drugging kidlets
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Replaced_Texan wrote:
I'm pretty sure that my parents used to spike juice on a regular basis when I was a kid. They had four kids under the age of six, I think they were justified if only to prevent infanticide. We used to call Creme de Menthe "medicina" when we were little.
Actually, around the turn of the (19th-to-20th) centuries, a lot of "teething potions" for infants were basically just opium. Can't go wrong with that!
[more code fixing by The Great And Powerful Not Bob]Back to top
_
EvenOdds
Guest
Posted: Fri Mar 14, 2003 4:03 pm__ _Post subject:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Replaced_Texan wrote:
....looks like our mod editing powers are on hiatus right now.
It's anarchy!
Quick, someone post porn!Back to top
_
bold_n_brazen
I Sure Do Post A Lot
Joined: 10 Mar 2003
Posts: 51
Location: At the Gas n' Sip
Posted: Fri Mar 14, 2003 4:03 pm__ _Post subject:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
BTW, are we ever going to get our avatars back?Back to top
_
pushy the puppy
Newbie
Joined: 14 Mar 2003
Posts: 3
Posted: Fri Mar 14, 2003 4:16 pm__ _Post subject:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
bold_n_brazen wrote:
BTW, are we ever going to get our avatars back?
Yes.
_________________
Pushy the Puppy
Last edited by pushy the puppy on Fri Mar 14, 2003 4:29 pm, edited 1 time in totalBack to top
_
Pretty_Little_Flower
I am simply a cog in the Lawtalk Machine
Joined: 09 Mar 2003
Posts: 31
Posted: Fri Mar 14, 2003 4:26 pm__ _Post subject: Yay!
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yay! Welcome Pushy.
_________________
The Flower is Prettier Than You.
Back to top
_
pushy the puppy
Newbie
Joined: 14 Mar 2003
Posts: 3
Posted: Fri Mar 14, 2003 4:33 pm__ _Post subject: Re: Yay!
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pretty_Little_Flower wrote:
Yay! Welcome Pushy.
Thank you. It feels very nice, PLF, to be welcomed by you and to be one of the two people - not that you and I are people, puppy and flower - on the board to have our very own avatars.
_________________
Pushy the Puppy
Back to top
_
Alex_de_Large
Hi Droogie
Joined: 10 Mar 2003
Posts: 70
Location: A cold, dank, dirty, scary place.
Posted: Fri Mar 14, 2003 4:36 pm__ _Post subject:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Replaced_Texan wrote:
Check out
http://www.mysmilies.com/ for an unbelievable amount of emoticons of all shapes and sizes. Pretty much every occassion you could think of is covered there.
that site rules.
_________________
AdL
"No time for the old in-out, love, I've just come to read the meter."Back to top
_
Pretty_Little_Flower
I am simply a cog in the Lawtalk Machine
Joined: 09 Mar 2003
Posts: 31
Posted: Fri Mar 14, 2003 4:38 pm__ _Post subject: Re: Yay!
------------------------------------------------------------------------
pushy the puppy wrote:
Thank you. It feels very nice, PLF, to be welcomed by you and to be one of the two people - not that you and I are people, puppy and flower - on the board to have our very own avatars.
I noticed that about the lack of avatars for the other suckers, I mean posters. Do you think you will ever get tired of ruling over these avatar-less peasants with an iron fist?
Don't bother answering that, for I already know what you will say.
Me neither.
_________________
The Flower is Prettier Than You.
Back to top
_
Replaced_Texan
I am simply a cog in the Lawtalk Machine
Joined: 10 Mar 2003
Posts: 67
Location: Deep in the heart
Posted: Fri Mar 14, 2003 4:40 pm__ _Post subject:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Alex_de_Large wrote:
Replaced_Texan wrote:
Check out
http://www.mysmilies.com/ for an unbelievable amount of emoticons of all shapes and sizes. Pretty much every occassion you could think of is covered there.
that site rules.
It's the hallmark store of emoticons Back to top
_
EvenOdds
Guest
Posted: Fri Mar 14, 2003 4:41 pm__ _Post subject: Re: Yay!
------------------------------------------------------------------------
pushy the puppy wrote:
Pretty_Little_Flower wrote:
Yay! Welcome Pushy.
Thank you. It feels very nice, PLF, to be welcomed by you and to be one of the two people - not that you and I are people, puppy and flower - on the board to have our very own avatars.
I, for one, am impressed by your avatars.
But why is Pushy's so much bigger than the Flower's?Back to top
_
Alex_de_Large
Hi Droogie
Joined: 10 Mar 2003
Posts: 70
Location: A cold, dank, dirty, scary place.
Posted: Fri Mar 14, 2003 4:41 pm__ _Post subject:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Replaced_Texan wrote:
Alex_de_Large wrote:
Replaced_Texan wrote:
Check out
http://www.mysmilies.com/ for an unbelievable amount of emoticons of all shapes and sizes. Pretty much every occassion you could think of is covered there.
that site rules.
It's the hallmark store of emoticons
I love this one:
_________________
AdL
"No time for the old in-out, love, I've just come to read the meter."
