Quote:
Originally posted by Secret_Agent_Man
No, no no. That wasn't what I was talking about. See, Larry?
|
A. Who's Larry?
B. I must have misunderstood the following lines: "
. The only reason it was done was to make the deficit look smaller. If some thing is done solely to create an incorrect impression, it is fair to call it misleading. I can see how I did mess that one up. They actually say "misleading", and not "political". That would tend to make any careless soul like me think they were speaking of "misleading" and not "political". Mea culpa.
(If you are now telling me that you were not taking up Ty's argument, then you should point out the clear indication of segue that I missed. Maybe I did. That's why you guys doing the double-team can get confusing. "No, no, that was Ty's point - I changed focus 3.52 posts ago.")
