LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 196
0 members and 196 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 04:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 02-06-2004, 04:55 PM   #776
Hank Chinaski
Proud Holder-Post 200,000
 
Hank Chinaski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Corner Office
Posts: 86,149
Gay Marriage

Quote:
Originally posted by Atticus Grinch
Judging by the local population, it appears this is a sentiment in search of an acronym. I suggest "IIAB/CYLL."*

*It's in a book. Check your local library.
After Ty's calling bullshit with those CAM Charles references, I must admit I did not attend Harvard. No, I went to a more vocational law school where my greatest interest in Constitutional law was whether I could take it pass/fail. Admitting that, and begging your indulgence, I think not me's question could be stated as:

one cannot legally distinguish between who can get married based upon the two genitals the couple may have. Such a distinction would violate equal protection.
How then can one distinguish between who can get married based upon the present marital status of the two.

I merely wish to help frame your further discussion. I am fully for all gay rights, and against polygamy. I fear in a society allowing polygamy I would not have been able to convice a women to marry me at all. to me its more a "common sense" thing.
__________________
I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts

Last edited by Hank Chinaski; 02-06-2004 at 05:05 PM..
Hank Chinaski is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:12 AM.