LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 100
0 members and 100 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 04:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 02-06-2004, 05:54 PM   #797
Tyrone Slothrop
Moderasaurus Rex
 
Tyrone Slothrop's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 33,080
Loving Court

Quote:
Originally posted by Not Me
You cannot argue violation of EP to get gay marriage. You have to argue fundamental rights and if you do, you cannot come up with an argument to support gay marriage that would not also support polygamy. Which was my whole point at the beginning of this.
I will take one more stab at this, since you may not have seen the amended content of my post above.

You say, marriage is defined as a man and a woman. What if the Virginia legislature had said, marriage is defined as a man and a woman of the same race? That's not discriminatory (sez them). Anyone is free to marry someone of the same race. Exactly our situation here.

The fact that marriage laws refer to men and women shows that they have limiting classifications in them. That language wouldn't be necessary unless you wanted to treat men and women differently.
__________________
“It was fortunate that so few men acted according to moral principle, because it was so easy to get principles wrong, and a determined person acting on mistaken principles could really do some damage." - Larissa MacFarquhar
Tyrone Slothrop is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:11 PM.