Quote:
Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield
The ludicrous securities fraud charge (based on Martha's protestations of innocence), which the judge will undoubtedly throw out at some point, is nothing short of amazing.
|
Maybe this is too Inside Baseball, but if this is a fair characterization of her false statements, why doesn't the Exculpatory No doctrine apply to them? Wasn't she charged under 18 U.S.C. § 1001?
I haven't been following this case, but if she merely protested her innocence, she's got an Exculpatory No defense.
