Quote:
Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield
Are you serious? Hillary has legs that belong on a piano, an ass wider than two strike zones and a face that could scare a dog off a meat wagon.
|
Perhaps all true, but we will see what Chelsea's ass and legs look like when she is Hillary's age. As for their faces:
In that picture, Hillary is pushing 50 or maybe in her 50's even. Chelsea is like 17. Should the 50 year old mother look better than the 17 year old daughter? I am not saying that Hillary is a looker. I am just saying that compared to Chelsea, Bill and Hill aren't that bad looking.
Don't even get me started on her hair. Does her hair mean that Bill would have a 'fro if he grew his out 'cuz Hillary's is straight.
Quote:
Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield
Bill may have a WC Fields cauliflower nose, but otherwise, he's a normal looking cat. Compared to his wife, he's Pierce Brosnan.
How could poor Chelsea avoid being ugly?
|
Agreed that Bill is Pierce compared to Hill, but that only helps my argument. Chelsea is not a clone of Hillary and her dad is better looking than Hillary but she is worse looking than either Bill or Hillary. You would expect her to be somewhere inbetween the two when it comes to level of attractiveness.
