Quote:
Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield
Ever been through an expert (Daubert in Fed terms) hearing? Like 99% of everything else in law, the judge can find precedent to support her in any decision. If she believed in the validity of the charge, the experts would get in.
|
I understand Daubert, but what I don't understand is if the judge doesn't believe in the validity of the charge, why didn't the judge just dismiss the charge then when the defense filed motions to dismiss.
That makes no sense to me. Why rule that the charge could go forward if the judge doesn't believe in the validity of the charge?
I also would like to know how is it that the DOJ usually enters testimony on what a reasonable investor thinks? Do they parade a bunch of investors into the courtroom?
