LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 210
0 members and 210 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 04:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 02-19-2004, 01:00 PM   #1718
sgtclub
Serenity Now
 
sgtclub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Survivor Island
Posts: 7,007
wisconsin

Quote:
Originally posted by Secret_Agent_Man
However, your point rests on the assumption that drug companies will not accept any less profit than they now make in order to remain in business, but will instead wither up and die (or take their money and run away) in the face of price resistance from the U.S. government. The complete lack of proof for this proposition fatally undermines your argument.
This assumption has merit. They will not accept significantly less profit. Instead what they will do is stop or significantly decrease investing in R&D (an expense) and trim jobs to right size the operation, which will negatively effect technical progress (e.g., good luck coming up with a cure for Alzheimers). They will also be less profitable over the long haul, which will have the effect of producing less wealth for the millions of people who have invested their retirement savings through 401(k)s mutual funds, etc.

I will continue to harp on this, but there are consequences to every action that need to be considered.
sgtclub is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:56 PM.