LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 194
0 members and 194 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 04:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 02-19-2004, 01:37 PM   #1734
Hank Chinaski
Proud Holder-Post 200,000
 
Hank Chinaski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Corner Office
Posts: 86,149
wisconsin

Quote:
Originally posted by Tyrone_Slothrop
What you're saying isn't rational. There's no reason for drug companies to leave money on the table, right? If what you say is try, they should be slashing R&D right now in order to pay bigger dividends to their shareholders. By this reasoning, we should get rid of anything that cuts into their profits -- taxes, etc. -- hell, we should be giving them money, in the hope that they will invest it in R&D.
Everyone running a company with shareholders recognizes this choice occurs over and over. When your firm buy new computers it limits what profits the shareholders make that month. When GM hires someone to design a car for 5 years from now, it limits what it can pay as share dividends. Drug companies just have a higher investment %. you need to invest for next year's product Ty.
Hank Chinaski is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:46 PM.