LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 119
0 members and 119 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 04:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 02-23-2004, 03:25 PM   #2014
Tyrone Slothrop
Moderasaurus Rex
 
Tyrone Slothrop's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 33,080
just a thought

Quote:
Originally posted by Not Me
Gender is an intermediate scrutiny class whereas religion is a strict scrutiny class. Polygamy is a religious practice to those who engage in it. So bringing up the suspect classes argument only strengthens the case for allowing polygamy.
If this were true, the authorities could not arrest Native Americans for using peyote as part of religious ceremonies because it would be discrimination against their religion. (An even stronger case than yours, since the peyote is used in ceremonies, while no one can think a man is obliged to have several wives -- the math doesn't work.) The Supreme Court has held otherwise. And if you think about it for half a second, it will occur to you that marriage statutes refer explicitly to gender, but do not refer explicitly to religion -- only to something that may be an indicia of religion.
__________________
“It was fortunate that so few men acted according to moral principle, because it was so easy to get principles wrong, and a determined person acting on mistaken principles could really do some damage." - Larissa MacFarquhar
Tyrone Slothrop is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:26 PM.