LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 1,445
0 members and 1,445 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 03-15-2004, 01:09 PM   #3488
Tyrone Slothrop
Moderasaurus Rex
 
Tyrone Slothrop's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 33,084
Bummer

Quote:
Originally posted by bilmore
This was AQ's most well-thought-out, and successful, move yet. (I'm assuming it was AQ, of course. If it was ETA, then the Spanish look a bit more foolish right now.) They actually overturned a government by scaring a population. This should make Spain much more secure in the long run. This new guy must be one of the phantom leaders who told Kerry that he has to win.
I think you assume too much. Matt Yglesias said it better than me:

Quote:
What a difference an assumption makes:
  • As Joe Gandleman has pointed out (see also here), the Socialists have promised to withdraw Spain from the Iraq coalition in the event of their election. Which is to say, of course, that the terrorists got what they wanted - assuming that Al Qa'eda was indeed behind the attack - to deter a European country from further participation in Iraq, after punishing it for its involvement to this point.

Well, yes, that's true if you add two auxiliary premises.
  • (a) al-Qaeda wants to deter European countries from further participation in Iraq.
    (b) al-Qaeda believed that launching the attack was likely to help the Socialist Party.
How strong are those assumptions? Well, the evidence for (a) seems to be that al-Qaeda is interested in killing western soldiers serving in Iraq. This, however, is consistent with them either wanting to drive the troops out, or else hoping more troops come so there will be more targets.

The evidence for (b) is that the Socialists did, in fact, win the election. In the immediate aftermath of the attack, however, the conventional wisdom was that this would help the PP as they would benefit from a "rally 'round the flag" effect. Certainly 9/11 was a great boon to the political popularity of George W. Bush (and other incumbents, notably Giuliani and Pataki) and rather predictably so.

At any rate, everyone's beliefs about these matters are so obviously going to be colored by their partisan political preferences that I don't know if there's a particular point in trying to argue for one version or another. It just seems worth pointing out that it's certainly not clear that this is what the terrorists were trying to achieve. Personally, I very much do not favor withdrawing troops from Iraq, and will be disappointed if that is the ultimate outcome of this tragedy. One ray of hope is that the circumstances of the attack would give the Socialist Party a possible excuse for flip-flopping were they so inclined. I doubt, however, that they will be.
linky
__________________
“It was fortunate that so few men acted according to moral principle, because it was so easy to get principles wrong, and a determined person acting on mistaken principles could really do some damage." - Larissa MacFarquhar
Tyrone Slothrop is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:18 AM.