Quote:
Originally posted by Say_hello_for_me
The NYT ran a overly-fawning article on the father's performance with the SCT yesterday, noting that the audience broke into applause at one point when he gave a clever retort to Rehnquist.
|
Did the audience think it was the Apollo?
From what I understand, Rehnquist asked a question along the lines of other conservatives: Why should't people objecting to the inclusion of "under god" get elected and remove it? Newdow's response was that athiests can't get elected. Bilmore's point seems teh more appropriate response, however: they shouldn't have to get elected because of the constitution.
