Quote:
Originally posted by Not Me
Well, things don't always go back to their pre-birth state. If they did, there would be no such thing as a vaginoplasty (aka vaginal rejuvenation):
http://www.labiaplastysurgeon.com/vaginoplasty.html
[SPREE - clinical drawings of vagina]
Moreover, ever hear of an episiotomy? There is a reason those are done. Those are done to produce a controlled tear to prevent an uncontrolled tear of the perineum during childbirth from tearing into the anal sphincter. Fecal incontinence is one potential risk of child birth if you opt out of the episiotomy and end up with a tear into the anal sphincter.
And you don't even want to know what it does to a pair of tits. Spinsterhood doesn't sound so bad, now does it?
|
(a) one can be unmarried and have no man and get pregnant and have a baby. (b) all I have to say about the rest of your stuff is, throughout history, women all over the world have sex even after they have given birth and only a tiny minority have had labioplasty or whatever. The big plus with DP is that if it starts to hurt, you can tell someone to pull back (or whatever) -- not so much an option with the baby coming out. And, as noted, the baby is likely to be bigger than the two penises.
But it's nice that you got to yap about post-birth vaginal surgery. You are kinda like raouaouaouoal in your penchant for long responses that are actually non-responsive.
