LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 673
1 members and 672 guests
Tyrone Slothrop
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 04:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 05-13-2003, 01:46 PM   #5640
Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)
Moderator
 
Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Pop goes the chupacabra
Posts: 18,532
There is no solution.

Quote:
Originally posted by ThrashersFan
The tobacco litigation and much of the anti-smoking campaign is based on the health costs associated with smoking (which does include non-smokers). The states put forth the idea that they were incurring extra healthcare costs because of diseases caused by smoking.
Yeah, that wsa the public justification. Which doesn't withstand scrutiny, since smokers die younger, so don't incur health care costs for an additional twenty years. And it's not like the states spent the money on actual care for smokers. No, it's to build bridges named after politicians. But I digress.
Mmmm, Burger (C.J.) is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:47 PM.