Quote:
Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
i understand the born-again v. coked-out angle, but does anyone under 50 really get bugged by an admission someone took drugs? I think the litmus test of no pot for Supreme's ensures weird-o nerds only. And makes otherwise honest candidates lie about not inhaling starting themselves down a slippery slope of half-truths.
|
I agree with you. I'm of a mind that, as long as you're not using now, I don't care what you did before.
I thought it was amusing that the coked out thing escaped revision, when it has proven easier for draft dodgers to win election than it has been for those who are avowed former drug users. Or maybe I just don't know enough about who's a former drug user. I hear Leo McGarry was in rehab for pills once, but he's not an elected official...
