LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 125
0 members and 125 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
View Single Post
Old 05-25-2004, 09:43 AM   #2934
sebastian_dangerfield
Moderator
 
sebastian_dangerfield's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Monty Capuletti's gazebo
Posts: 26,231
Whack job

Quote:
Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
Please. This was really fun, and said so much about Chris. It wasn't loyalty to Tony that made the decision, it was like Henry Hill said at the end of Goodfellas, the fucked thing is having to be a regular guy- you know that was going through Chris' head watching that dad cart his mess around. (although they couldn't have kids- right?).

Plus, her drug problem and really the FBI problem were Chris' fault. It's like Days of Wine and Roses, but with a quicker ending.
Like most of the subplots, Adrienna's FBI gig was never fully fleshed out. It popped up here and there and never really went anywhere. Then they end it by inserting a murder committed by a character we've never seen before? It was obvious Adrienna was either getting whacked or going to jail, like Pussy. They should have let her get the wire, then get caught with it and get whacked. The sudden "murder" angle was contrived and desperate. Although I do give the writers points for portraying Silvio, Tony and Chris as coldhearted bastards. Tony's call and Silvio's commentary where he tells her "Chris will be just fine" is great. The question it leaves is "Did she know she was being driven to the woods but went anyway because if she couldn't trust Chris, there was no point?"

They don't use Silvio and Paulie nearly enough, and they're the two best characters in the show. Van Zandt's a pretty good actor.
__________________
All is for the best in the best of all possible worlds.
sebastian_dangerfield is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:13 AM.