Quote:
Originally posted by Mister_Ruysbroeck
I could care less about Lindsay Lohan's legs (other than to say that if they were wrapped around me, I really wouldn't complain).
|
My main thought on Lindsay Lohan is that it's a real shame she's only 17. If she looks like she's 30 at 17, it doens't bode well for her at 25. I wonder if it's something about life as an actress that ages these girls so fast, or if the industry picks them so young because they look like ingenues, so they just naturally aim for the girls who bloom brightly early on, but burn out like a nova by the time they turn adult?
