Quote:
Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield
More importantly, why is Ashcroft not at least trying to prosecute him? The DOJ under Ashcroft has been seeking to push the envelope of prosecutable offense using the terror prtext for some time. Seems Novak is an excellent test case for the law you cite above. At a minimum, a diligent prosecutor would charge Novak to squeeze him into providing info.
|
The info Novak would provide would necessarily implicate someone in the Bush administration. So, unless it's Tenet or Whitman (Todd-Whitman? whatever) or someone else shoved out, it'd really be an aid to terrorism to prosecute this. Because, you know, making the admin look bad is WAY worse for the war on terrorism than the leaking of info on traitorous* covert operatives.
*she is clearly a traitor and wants to aid terrorists because she is married to someone who criticized the admin's case for war. Like, Terrorist, 3rd Degree.
