LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 107
1 members and 106 guests
Hank Chinaski
Most users ever online was 4,499, 10-26-2015 at 07:55 AM.
View Single Post
Old 03-15-2018, 09:35 AM   #4841
sebastian_dangerfield
Moderator
 
sebastian_dangerfield's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Monty Capuletti's gazebo
Posts: 26,094
Re: There are half-wits, and then there are no-wits

Quote:
Originally Posted by Greedy,Greedy,Greedy View Post
No, the base didn't turn, but the non-base support for Trump peeled away.

Sebby isn't Trump's base. But he is part of the Trump coalition. Maybe it's a small distinction, but it's an important one.
How?

ETA: It’s my fault the parties ran candidates so bad I felt the need to order off the menu? It’s my fault the Democrats ran a candidate so bad she lost to a guy who didn’t even want to win? I should have seen a Trump win coming despite endless polls predicting Hillary? If I’m inadvertently part of his coalition, it’s because all the people who were supposed to keep Trump from happening: (a) failed to do so; (b) allowed a weak but powerful candidate to run; and, (c) got behind a media narrative that Hillary was inevitable, which those experts should have known was more hope than fact.

I was thrust into a coalition I don’t like. I’ll accept that I’m there. But the people who caused it need to own up to it. I should be a allowed to vote a third party candidate without consequence.
__________________
All is for the best in the best of all possible worlds.

Last edited by sebastian_dangerfield; 03-15-2018 at 09:51 AM..
sebastian_dangerfield is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:31 PM.