Quote:
Originally Posted by Pretty Little Flower
Can you believe this bullshit?
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/02/11/u...dard-2020.html
First, nobody EVER branded Hillary as shrill. I read that on the internet. Second, the idea that men would use the world shrill to disparage uppity women is laughable. The beauty of the word shrill is that is it almost exclusively used by women, to great cutting effect. By the way, while on the uppity women tip, you should know that it's no longer "o.k." to state that these women are "persisting." McConnell ruined that for everyone.
But that's not why I am here. I am just here to share a video of Cardi B in homage to her win at the Grammys. It's profane because, well, Cardi B:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nu9EX9YRTdQ |
Who said Gillibrand was shrill? I said she's soulless. She's a stuffed suit. And an ambitious opportunist.
I think she's a zero. Like Mitt Romney was a zero. I think she's guided by nothing but focus groups and polls, and has no independent thought.
So without knowing who exactly you were writing to, or what your point was, here's my view on the candidates:
Beto: Vacant media darling, McCandidate
Harris: Smart and thoughtful, but has to up the charisma a bit
Warren: Super-smart and formidable (if people will pay attention to her sometimes complex policy arguments)
Bernie: Past sell by date
Klobuchar: Don't know anything about her
Booker: Smart, but overthinking and too perfect, occasionally precious
Biden: He can walk away with it, as he could have in 2016
Gillibrand: 0.00, total phony
Kasich: DOA, egomaniac
Christie: Trump v. Trump
Romney: Oh, fuck... Not again
Schultz: Not dynamic enough to be a spoiler... 15 min almost up
