LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 110
2 members and 108 guests
Greedy,Greedy,Greedy, Hank Chinaski
Most users ever online was 4,499, 10-26-2015 at 08:55 AM.
View Single Post
Old 10-10-2018, 03:51 PM   #3506
Adder
I am beyond a rank!
 
Adder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 16,553
Re: We are all Slave now.

Quote:
Originally Posted by sebastian_dangerfield View Post
You are dead wrong if you believe based on a credible accusation alone, and a blanket denial, a nominee should be dinged. That's dangerous thinking.
First, it's not. Nothing bad was going to happen to him.

But second, he lied about things to bolster his blanket denial. Of course he never blacked out, because if he had, it could be he couldn't remember and he needs to be able to say "no", not "I don't remember." That's enough to discredit his denial. Once you've done that...

Finally, no one said credible accusation and blanket denial alone.


Quote:
Agreed on lies, not on temperament.
He as much as threatened partisan retribution from the bench ("what goes around comes around"). That's disqualifying on temperament.

Last edited by Adder; 10-10-2018 at 04:30 PM..
Adder is offline  
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:33 AM.