LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 134
2 members and 132 guests
Hank Chinaski, Tyrone Slothrop
Most users ever online was 4,499, 10-26-2015 at 07:55 AM.
View Single Post
Old 07-12-2003, 05:27 PM   #236
ms. naughty diplomat
naughty but sweet
 
ms. naughty diplomat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: dramatically lowering my post per day average
Posts: 266
did i break the bored

Quote:
Originally posted by andViolins
Well, I guess the question is what is a viable candidate? The only other name that I have heard raised as a possibility for the democrats is Eric Fingerhut. Outside of Cleveland, I don't know how many people know who he is. Springer's got name recognition. He's bright, and can identify issues [need jobs, health care, better Cincinnati football team, etc.] Can he win? Good question. Don't really think so, but again, don't know of any other democratic candidate that stands any better chance.

aV
but if you use likelihood of election as the definition of viability springer would certainally be a more viable candidate for the senate that kuninich (or however you spell is name) is for president.
ms. naughty diplomat is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:01 PM.