|
Re: We are all Slave now.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski
A judge shouldn't express "feelings" about binding precedent. Most judges must have feelings about what came before that they must follow. They shouldn't allow that to impact decisions. The whole "how do you feel about X" grew out of Roe. I doubt it came up before the 80s.
I don't disagree she probably believes whites and blacks shouldn't be in school together, but without the "how do you feel about Citizen's" question the answer appears okay. If one of Pony's associates came back with this as a dep transcript, he'd fire the guy. Ask the money question, not just the one that causes your base to post quotes of your question on social media.
|
I don't get how one has a meaningful hearing without discussing a judge's views on legal precedent and process. I just don't see what the purpose is without that.
__________________
A wee dram a day!
|
