Quote:
Originally posted by sebastian_dangerfield
No. No he's not. He has said, and you should support him on this, that he favors STATES having the right to decide the issue, but that there should be no Constiitutional Amendment on it. And he's right. It is a state issue. And when its rightly left under state control, we will not only have a religious chasm between states, we'll also have a taste chasm.
You right leaning bastards are going to force me to fly somewhere to get a good decorator. Thanks.
|
Yawwwwn, so what exactly is his opposition to gay marriage? I'm the one saying he's not opposed to it, and you Democratic freaks should be yelling Amen. If its not clear, I'm only opposed to using the word marriage, but other than that I'm pretty sure that most of us here are in the same ballpark on the issue.
WRT Kerry, we are all characterizing the same things here. All I'm saying, is Senator flip-flop couldn't define his "opposition" as "opposition" if he were being prodded to do so by a 6'2 hairy-chested salt-and-pepper haired bruiser in a leather get-up.
You guys are saying, well yeah, he's opposed, just not to this, a little to that, and well, no not really to that either. But he's opposed. He says it because it resonates with the simple-minded people you are constantly bemoaning here. They believe him.
Threaded Mode