LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers > General Discussion > Politics

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 2,512
0 members and 2,512 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 12-22-2005, 04:02 PM   #11
Sexual Harassment Panda
Don't touch there
 
Sexual Harassment Panda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Master-Planned Reality-Based Community
Posts: 1,220
Intellectual dishonesty?

Quote:
Originally posted by str8outavannuys
I've received a lot of emails from WH-apologist friends today with stories of previous administrations conducting warrantless searches in the foreign intelligence realm pursuant to the President's inherent constitutional powers. Most of these stories begin by discussing warrantless electronic surveilance, and seem to say that previous Presidents have engaged in identical behvaior. However, the stories use the term "warrantless searches". My guess is that this refers to physical searches, and not electronic eavesdropping. The interception of communications without judicial review is new ground.
If those stories are passing along the RNC talking points channeled by Drudge about Clinton and Carter executive orders, they are wrong - the Clinton and Carter executive orders did not permit warrantless searches of US citizens.
Sexual Harassment Panda is offline  
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:04 AM.