LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers > General Discussion > Politics

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 3,422
0 members and 3,422 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 03-15-2006, 06:35 PM   #11
ltl/fb
Registered User
 
ltl/fb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Flyover land
Posts: 19,042
South Dakota question

Quote:
Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
I apologize for hurting your feelings by forgetting what was surely a lucid, timely, and informative post. But your "under this law" caveat is exactly what I'm talking about. Thanks to Burger, we know that the law says:
  • Nothing in this Act may be construed to subject the pregnant mother upon whom any abortion is performed or attempted to any criminal conviction and penalty.

A prosecutor would argue that a woman charged with conspiracy or aiding and abetting is not being "subjected" to criminal conviction or penalty under "this Act" -- she's being charged with conspiracy or aiding and abetting, which are distinct crimes.
Dude, check out the bold italicized above. It doesn't limit it to under "this Act." It says any at all.
ltl/fb is offline  
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:55 AM.