LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers > General Discussion > Politics

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 194
0 members and 194 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 04:16 AM.
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 10-16-2006, 03:17 PM   #11
Spanky
For what it's worth
 
Spanky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: With Thumper
Posts: 6,793
Why a Democrat congress is bad for foreign policy...

Quote:
Originally posted by Gattigap
Well, you're right that the 2-superpower model kept in check a number of regional problems, owing to the fact that one power or other other made them shut up in the interest of staying in the good graces of said superpower. But I think it's too hard to assume away the USSR's underlying problems and imagine a 1980-era USSR around today. Even though we did spend them into penury with the Cold War, it's hard to really visualize them tromping around in today's environment.

Besides, NK wasn't really under one umbrella or the other, right?
As long as Saddam was in power we could not pull our troops out of Saudi Arabia and we could not stop the sanctions. All bases in Saudi Arabia are now closed (the big problem was having them so close to Mecca and Medina). Eventually the occupation will end and then no troops and no sanctions.

But I am sure they will stil have a problem with us.

Last edited by Spanky; 10-16-2006 at 03:36 PM..
Spanky is offline  
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:10 AM.