» Site Navigation |
|
» Online Users: 1,281 |
0 members and 1,281 guests |
No Members online |
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 04:16 AM. |
|
01-16-2017, 06:30 PM
|
#11
|
Moderasaurus Rex
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 33,080
|
Re: Third rail?
Quote:
Originally Posted by sebastian_dangerfield
Why is an "America First" position something to be excoriated?
I've seen a number of economists rip it as bad policy to the extent it involves tariffs, trade wars, etc. That I fully understand.
But I've also seen a good bit of non-economist criticism of an America First policy, on the basis that it's somehow wrong (unethical, immoral... it's never fully fleshed out) to put US interests first. But... isn't that exactly what we do all the time? Isn't that kind of an essential behavior of a state -- that it act first and foremost in the interests of its citizens initially, all others secondarily? Hasn't our national policy, and the national policies of every other state, been to act in its own interests?
If this seems to borrow some logic from Louis CK's "Of course, but maybe..." routine, it's intentional.
|
When Trump says "America First," do you think he's proposing to do exactly what we do all the time? No. So when he says that, what do you think he means?
__________________
“It was fortunate that so few men acted according to moral principle, because it was so easy to get principles wrong, and a determined person acting on mistaken principles could really do some damage." - Larissa MacFarquhar
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:27 PM.