LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers > General Discussion > Politics

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 3,457
0 members and 3,457 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 03-13-2020, 06:39 PM   #11
sebastian_dangerfield
Moderator
 
sebastian_dangerfield's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Monty Capuletti's gazebo
Posts: 26,231
Re: Objectively intelligent.

Quote:
Originally Posted by LessinSF View Post
I had a judge laugh at opposing counsel today when he argued that there was no need for a preliminary injunction because the parallel unlawful detainer case was proceeding apace and would resolve the issue of what the tenant was doing on the property - the judge said he wasn't sure a UD case would go to (a jury) trial for the rest of this year.
This could crush plaintiffs’ firms that don’t have huge reserves. Delay on all files at once = Death. Every defendant will delay like crazy based on inability to do deps, meetings, etc.
__________________
All is for the best in the best of all possible worlds.
sebastian_dangerfield is offline  
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:46 PM.