LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers > General Discussion > Politics

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 2,651
0 members and 2,651 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 04:16 AM.
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 06-21-2020, 09:58 PM   #11
sebastian_dangerfield
Moderator
 
sebastian_dangerfield's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Monty Capuletti's gazebo
Posts: 26,231
Re: Objectively intelligent.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tyrone Slothrop View Post
Traditional journalist writes about an angry Twitter mob. Never gets old. Are those kids off Taibbi's lawn yet?
That’s the only comeback you’ll ever have to what he wrote.

You can’t get near it on substance. You can’t even try. And in a public square, you versus him? He’d scatter your teeth on this subject in a debate.

You couldn’t even argue with Greenwald on this issue.

ETA: What’s a “traditional” journalist? I have time to write tomorrow, and I’ve a few thoughts on how silly your explanation of “non-traditional” journalism is going to be. Here’s a tip: Don’t even try to argue that journalism shouldn’t necessarily be objective. If you write that Wolfe or Thompson would support the bullshit in our media today, you’re going to regret it.
__________________
All is for the best in the best of all possible worlds.

Last edited by sebastian_dangerfield; 06-21-2020 at 11:09 PM..
sebastian_dangerfield is offline  
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:55 AM.