» Site Navigation |
|
|
» Online Users: 2,898 |
| 0 members and 2,898 guests |
| No Members online |
| Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM. |
|
02-03-2004, 10:04 PM
|
#11
|
|
Serenity Now
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Survivor Island
Posts: 7,007
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Tyrone_Slothrop
Is there any principled reason to exclude the costs of (a) Iraq, (b) Afghanistan, (c) AMT changes, (d) etc. from his budget? No. The only reason it was done was to make the deficit look smaller. If some thing is done solely to create an incorrect impression, it is fair to call it misleading. The fact that the press sometimes picks up on this does not change it. The Administration does it because the press coverage will revolve around its description, even when the reporters know better.
|
I suspect that there may be technical accounting reasons why this is done, but I don't know enough about accounting.
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:30 AM.