LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers > General Discussion > Politics

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 103
0 members and 103 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 09-14-2004, 10:42 AM   #11
bilmore
Too Good For Post Numbers
 
bilmore's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 65,535
general pet peeve (comments from Chicagoans?)

Quote:
Originally posted by baltassoc
You can claim all you want it is a good indicator of likelihood of default, and it still sounds like a pretense.
Not our argument. With S.8, there is a much less likelihood of default - like, zero. The problems to which I refer are the rowdy, destructive, irresponsible, property-damaging, neighbor-alienating, party-all-week kind of tenants. Statistically, people with S.8 support are less likely to have jobs, less likely to have a reason to get up early and thus less likely to wind down before 4:00 a.m., less likely to pause before breaking through the wallboard with their fist for fun, less likely to feel bad about dumping their bottles out the back window, and just generally less likely to treat MY property with any care or concern. See Club, supra, "Pride of Rentership".

Are there S8 recipients who do act properly regarding the property and rights of others? Of course - most, in fact. But, just playing the odds, the chances of encountering a sleaze are higher when you accept S8.
bilmore is offline  
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:55 AM.