LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers > General Discussion > Politics

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 94
0 members and 94 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 09-14-2004, 12:03 PM   #11
sebastian_dangerfield
Moderator
 
sebastian_dangerfield's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Monty Capuletti's gazebo
Posts: 26,231
general pet peeve (comments from Chicagoans?)

Quote:
Originally posted by Say_hello_for_me

I'm still not seeing why the working class city neighborhoods should have 25% of the homes occupied by section 8ers while the new suburban subdivisions have 0%. Particularly when its the government common to the city and the suburbs thats imposing the burden on anyone.

Hello
Because all the homes in the burbs are owned and occupied by families. I don't know about your area, but in my area, houses are on the market for days, not weeks, and bidding wars are the rule. There are no rentals in many of the attractive suburbs around here. The rentals that do exist are also usually filled.

Secondarily, if you live in the burbs, you have the added cost of the commute. People already cash strapped can't take on those added expenses (particularly here, where the fares are going up 25% - the monthly pass is between $100-150 now).
__________________
All is for the best in the best of all possible worlds.
sebastian_dangerfield is offline  
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:46 AM.