LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers > Miscellaneous > Technology

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 129
0 members and 129 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 04-19-2006, 06:11 PM   #11
taxwonk
Wild Rumpus Facilitator
 
taxwonk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: In a teeny, tiny, little office
Posts: 14,167
SBC --> AT&T

Quote:
Originally posted by Cletus Miller
Because, as Burger noted, "SBC took the higher-value name"--the name itself was a meaningful asset. Yes, the company's name is now ATT, the ticker symbol is T, but the company remains headquartered in SBC's hometown--San Antonio and the CEO of new ATT was the CEO of SBC. Tell me you don't actually do deal work--this is not an uncommon occurence.
Not only that, but SBC can now amortize the value of that name of 15 years. But that's just boring tax shit, so I'll drop it.
__________________
Send in the evil clowns.
taxwonk is offline   Reply With Quote
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:52 PM.