LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers > General Discussion > Politics

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 101
0 members and 101 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 04:16 AM.
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 10-14-2006, 09:28 PM   #11
Hank Chinaski
Proud Holder-Post 200,000
 
Hank Chinaski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Corner Office
Posts: 86,149
Appeasement never works

Quote:
Originally posted by Tyrone Slothrop
I haven't posted to a single blog on this stuff, dumbass. Meanwhile, Spanky still thinks that we build North Korea those two light-water reactors, and club insists that it's 99% likely that North Korea continued to process plutonium between 1994 and 2002.

Even if -- if -- North Korea had some plutonium in 1994, they didn't make more for eight years.
The only evidence posted here was they had some in 2000, had enough in fact.

no evidence of the "didn't make more."

do you agree making an agreement we wouldn't honor was not a good idea, other than "buying time until Clinton's admin was over?" and I'm not hanging Spank out to dry, I'm going SJ mode- assume what Ty says is true- Clinton never intended to honor the agreement and provide the technology- isn't that way worse than not making the agreement- for the future I mean? I get how it helped Clinton focus on more important stuff.

Do you agree providing know-how wrt the power plants was a really bad idea?
__________________
I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts

Last edited by Hank Chinaski; 10-14-2006 at 09:31 PM..
Hank Chinaski is offline  
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:11 PM.