| 
	
		
			
				|  » Site Navigation |  
	|  |  
	
		
			
				|  » Online Users: 220 |  
| 0 members and 220 guests |  
		| No Members online |  
		| Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 04:16 AM. |  | 
	
		|  |  |  
	
	
	
	
		|  04-09-2003, 02:21 AM | #46 |  
	| Quality not quantity 
				 
				Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Stumptown, USA 
					Posts: 1,344
				      | 
				
				I am the most timmy
			 
 Or at least I'm having serial annoyances.
 In a forwarded e-mail message today: "froth" when he meant "fraught."
 
 tm
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
	
		|  04-10-2003, 01:15 AM | #47 |  
	| Underpants Gnomes! 
				 
				Join Date: Mar 2003 
					Posts: 302
				      | U.S. to host oppoition meeting in Iraq 
 cnn.com's headline ticker (at 10:06pm PST on April 9, 2003).
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
	
		|  04-10-2003, 03:11 PM | #48 |  
	| Moderator 
				 
				Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: State of Chaos 
					Posts: 8,197
				      | 
				
				I am the most timmy
			 
 
	Quote: 
	
		| Originally posted by tmdiva Or at least I'm having serial annoyances.
 
 In a forwarded e-mail message today: "froth" when he meant "fraught."
 
 tm
 |  Does the sender pronounce height as "heighth," too? |  
	|   |   |  
	
	
		|  04-11-2003, 01:39 PM | #49 |  
	| Hello, Dum-Dum. 
				 
				Join Date: Mar 2003 
					Posts: 10,117
				      | 
				
				Inure
			 
 Thanks to Dictionary.com's Word of the Day, I'm starting to wonder whether I and every lawyer I've ever met have been using "inure" incorrectly.  Of course, it never gets used except in the phrase "inures to the detriment of the plaintiff," in which phrase it's pretty meaningless anyway.  When you file a complaint, the average reader will safely assume that you're complaining that something or someone is giving you some cause to complain.
 [Edit: typo]
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
	
		|  04-11-2003, 02:04 PM | #50 |  
	| Trashy Wench 
				 
				Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: reclining on a pile of cash 
					Posts: 298
				      | 
				
				Inure
			 
 In transactional practice, a thing inures to a person when it benefits that person or or that person fixes his interest in it.
 What I am wondering is why "X inures to the benefit of Y" is the drafting standard.  It seems redundant.
 
 Any Edwin Newman types out there?
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
	
		|  04-11-2003, 02:06 PM | #51 |  
	| Trashy Wench 
				 
				Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: reclining on a pile of cash 
					Posts: 298
				      | 
				
				Or or
			 
 Flame away! |  
	|   |   |  
	
	
		|  04-11-2003, 02:20 PM | #52 |  
	| Moderator 
				 
				Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Pop goes the chupacabra 
					Posts: 18,532
				      | 
				
				Inure
			 
 
	Quote: 
	
		| Originally posted by Atticus Grinch Thanks to Dictionary.com's Word of the Day, I'm starting to wonder whether I and every lawyer I've ever met have been using "inure" incorrectly.  Of course, it never gets used except in the phrase "inures to the detriment of the plaintiff," in which phrase it's pretty meaningless anyway.  When you file a complaint, the average reader will safely assume that you're complaining that something or someone is giving you some cause to complain.
 
 [Edit: typo]
 |  They must be repeating themselves:
Dec. 20, 1999, WOTD 
It does seem incorrectly used.  In an "obviates the need for" kind of way. |  
	|   |   |  
	
	
		|  04-13-2003, 01:23 AM | #53 |  
	| Underpants Gnomes! 
				 
				Join Date: Mar 2003 
					Posts: 302
				      | 
				
				cnn.com does it again
			 
 CNN's Brent Sadler: Tikrit quite, looks like ghost town
location: http://www.cnn.com , first bullet point under very big "Tikrit Abandoned" headline (at 22:21 PST on April 13, 2003)
 
NOTE: The mistake was corrected within three minutes of my post. 
				 Last edited by pretermitted_child; 04-13-2003 at 01:28 AM..
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
	
		|  04-13-2003, 07:36 PM | #54 |  
	| Guest | 
				
				Inure
			 
 Originally posted by Atticus Grinch 
	Quote: 
	
		| Thanks to Dictionary.com's Word of the Day, I'm starting to wonder whether I and every lawyer I've ever met have been using "inure" incorrectly.  Of course, it never gets used except in the phrase "inures to the detriment of the plaintiff," in which phrase it's pretty meaningless anyway. |  You haven't seen a lawyer use the word "inure" in the transitive sense?  One would've thought you moved in better circles.
 
In any event, Dictionary.com's definition of "inure"'s intrasitive sense is incomplete.  It's used in two ways:  (i) come into effect, take or have effect, be applied &c , or (ii) to serve to the use or benefit of (e.g., the donation inured to the benefit of the charity).
 
Other dictionaries, perhaps even yours, include a broader definition of the intransitive sense. |  
	|  |   |  
	
	
		|  04-15-2003, 02:43 PM | #55 |  
	| Hello, Dum-Dum. 
				 
				Join Date: Mar 2003 
					Posts: 10,117
				      | 
				
				Inure
			 
 
	Quote: 
	
		| Originally posted by coup_d'skek In any event, Dictionary.com's definition of "inure"'s intrasitive sense is incomplete.  It's used in two ways:  (i) come into effect, take or have effect, be applied &c , or (ii) to serve to the use or benefit of (e.g., the donation inured to the benefit of the charity).
 |  What a relief!  My cheap-ass firm doesn't have one of those better dictionaries upon which you rely.  Is your firm accepting resumes?  Because I really hope we can be cubicle-mates and share a copy of the OED and perhaps much more. |  
	|   |   |  
	
	
		|  04-15-2003, 02:55 PM | #56 |  
	| Consigliere 
				 
				Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Pelosi Land! 
					Posts: 9,480
				      | 
				
				A roomful of wannabe Safires
			 
 My god, who started this room?
 My god, no wonder I hated law school so much.
 
 
 not7yS(hoot me)
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
	
		|  04-15-2003, 05:21 PM | #57 |  
	| Underpants Gnomes! 
				 
				Join Date: Mar 2003 
					Posts: 302
				      | 
				
				A roomful of wannabe Safires
			 
 
	Quote: 
	
		| Originally posted by SlaveNoMore My god, who started this room?
 |  Mistress Eaze so graciously 
conjured this room with alacrity 
upon a silly request from me 
so the FB remains timmy-free
 
pretermitted(with a flourish, em doffs em's feathered cap and bows deeply)child |  
	|   |   |  
	
	
		|  04-15-2003, 07:54 PM | #58 |  
	| Registered User 
				 
				Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Government Yard in Trenchtown 
					Posts: 20,182
				      | 
				
				Inure
			 
 
	Quote: 
	
		| Originally posted by coup_d'skek Originally posted by Atticus Grinch
 
 
 You haven't seen a lawyer use the word "inure" in the transitive sense?  One would've thought you moved in better circles.
 
 In any event, Dictionary.com's definition of "inure"'s intrasitive sense is incomplete.  It's used in two ways:  (i) come into effect, take or have effect, be applied &c , or (ii) to serve to the use or benefit of (e.g., the donation inured to the benefit of the charity).
 
 Other dictionaries, perhaps even yours, include a broader definition of the intransitive sense.
 |  All these lawyers and no one has noted that inure is a term of art, set out in section 501(c)(3) of the tax code (no part of the net earnings of a charity may inure to a private individual) and defined in the regulations as well as various rulings and cases?!?!!
 
Class, please, remember that dictionaries constitute neither statutes nor caselaw, and thus have no precedential value unless cited by said statutes or caselaw.  The legal term of art is not subject to amendment by the rabble, even when the rabble have JDs.
				__________________A wee dram a day!
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
	
		|  04-15-2003, 07:57 PM | #59 |  
	| Registered User 
				 
				Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Government Yard in Trenchtown 
					Posts: 20,182
				      | 
				
				A roomful of wannabe Safires
			 
 
	Quote: 
	
		| Originally posted by pretermitted_child Mistress Eaze so graciously
 conjured this room with alacrity
 upon a silly request from me
 so the FB remains timmy-free
 
 
 pretermitted(with a flourish, em doffs em's feathered cap and bows deeply)child
 |  
HERE HERE!!  
 
Good Post, but must the FB be truly timmifry?
				__________________A wee dram a day!
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
	
		|  04-15-2003, 10:13 PM | #60 |  
	| Underpants Gnomes! 
				 
				Join Date: Mar 2003 
					Posts: 302
				      | 
				
				and this is the Delicious Dish on National Public Radio . . .
			 
 
	Quote: 
	
		| Originally posted by Greedy,Greedy,Greedy HERE HERE!!
 
 Good Post, but must the FB be truly timmifry?
 |  timmifry? Is this some new dish?
 
pretermitted(I can't cook)child |  
	|   |   |  
	
		|  |  |  
 
	| Thread Tools |  
	|  |  
	| Display Modes |  
	
	| 
		 Linear Mode |  
 
	| 
	|  Posting Rules |  
	| 
		
		You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts 
 HTML code is Off 
 |  |  |  
 
	
	
		
	
	
 |