| 
	
		
			
				|  » Site Navigation |  
	|  |  
	
		
			
				|  » Online Users: 217 |  
| 0 members and 217 guests |  
		| No Members online |  
		| Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 04:16 AM. |  | 
	
		|  |  |  
	
	
	
	
		|  10-19-2009, 02:09 PM | #931 |  
	| Registered User 
				 
				Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Throwing a kettle over a pub 
					Posts: 14,753
				      | 
				
				Re: Calling Hollywood.
			 
 
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Atticus Grinch  Edward Norton needs to do a biopic of Walt Disney while the creepy resemblance still happens with only the addition of a pencil mustache. |  And Alton Brown and the Mythbusters gang need to team up on a show about food myths.  Who do I pitch this idea to?
				__________________No no no, that's not gonna help. That's not gonna help and I'll tell you why: It doesn't unbang your Mom.
 |  
	|   |  |  
	
	
		|  10-19-2009, 02:15 PM | #932 |  
	| Random Syndicate (admin) 
				 
				Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Romantically enfranchised 
					Posts: 14,281
				      | 
				
				Re: Calling Hollywood.
			 
 
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Did you just call me Coltrane?  And Alton Brown and the Mythbusters gang need to team up on a show about food myths.  Who do I pitch this idea to? |  You could make a few YouTube videos and then send up a trial baloon.
				__________________"In the olden days before the internet, you'd take this sort of person for a ride out into the woods and shoot them, as Darwin intended, before he could spawn."--Will the Vampire People Leave the Lobby? pg 79
 
 |  
	|   |  |  
	
	
		|  10-19-2009, 02:24 PM | #933 |  
	| I am beyond a rank! 
				 
				Join Date: Mar 2003 
					Posts: 17,175
				      | 
				
				Re: Calling Hollywood.
			 
 
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Did you just call me Coltrane?  And Alton Brown and the Mythbusters gang need to team up on a show about food myths.  Who do I pitch this idea to? |  As the Food Network already has Food Detectives , I suspect they would not be interested. |  
	|   |  |  
	
	
		|  10-19-2009, 02:51 PM | #934 |  
	| I am beyond a rank! 
				 
				Join Date: Mar 2003 
					Posts: 11,873
				      | 
				
				Re: Calling Hollywood.
			 
 
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Adder  As the Food Network already has Food Detectives , I suspect they would not be interested. |  Yeah, different TV networks would never plow the same ground.
 
Mythbusters already does food-related myths, on occasion.  And from a quick look at the link you gave, I can tell you that the two shows have even looked at the exact same myth, on at least one occasion -- the "5-second rule" for food dropped on the floor.  Food Detectives has a bit on "What's the deal with the 5-second rule?", while Mythbusters "busted" the myth by measuring bacteria on food before and after 5 seconds on the floor.
				__________________Where are my elephants?!?!
 |  
	|   |  |  
	
	
		|  10-19-2009, 02:53 PM | #935 |  
	| Southern charmer 
				 
				Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: At the Great Altar of Passive Entertainment 
					Posts: 7,033
				      | 
				
				Re: Calling Hollywood.
			 
 
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Sidd Finch  Yeah, different TV networks would never plow the same ground.
 
 Mythbusters already does food-related myths, on occasion.  And from a quick look at the link you gave, I can tell you that the two shows have even looked at the exact same myth, on at least one occasion -- the "5-second rule" for food dropped on the floor.  Food Detectives has a bit on "What's the deal with the 5-second rule?", while Mythbusters "busted" the myth by measuring bacteria on food before and after 5 seconds on the floor.
 |  My favorite was testing the myth of which was better for you -- the sugary breakfast cereal, or the box in which it came? |  
	|   |  |  
	
	
		|  10-19-2009, 03:06 PM | #936 |  
	| I am beyond a rank! 
				 
				Join Date: Mar 2003 
					Posts: 17,175
				      | 
				
				Re: Calling Hollywood.
			 
 
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Sidd Finch  Yeah, different TV networks would never plow the same ground. |  Alton Brown is employed by the Food Network. |  
	|   |  |  
	
	
		|  10-19-2009, 03:23 PM | #937 |  
	| Patch Diva 
				 
				Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Winter Wonderland 
					Posts: 4,607
				      | 
				
				Re: Calling Hollywood.
			 
 
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Replaced_Texan  You could make a few YouTube videos and then send up a trial baloon. |  Just don't pretend your kid is in the balloon. |  
	|   |  |  
	
	
		|  10-19-2009, 03:44 PM | #938 |  
	| Hello, Dum-Dum. 
				 
				Join Date: Mar 2003 
					Posts: 10,117
				      | 
				
				The sheer awesomeness does. Not. Stop.
			 
 |  
	|   |  |  
	
	
		|  10-19-2009, 03:50 PM | #939 |  
	| Wearing the cranky pants 
				 
				Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Pulling your finger 
					Posts: 7,122
				      | 
				
				Google Books Brouhaha
			 
 I admit to not having followed the Google Books dispute, but I ran across this article over the weekend and thought it did a good job of explaining it, if anyone else is interested - http://www.eastbayexpress.com/news/t...nt?oid=1211860
				__________________Boogers!
 |  
	|   |  |  
	
	
		|  10-19-2009, 04:00 PM | #940 |  
	| Wild Rumpus Facilitator 
				 
				Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: In a teeny, tiny, little office 
					Posts: 14,167
				      | 
				
				Re: I am an old man.
			 
 
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by PresentTense Pirate Penske  I am, and yet I agree with your recap above. Go figure. |  Even a blind pig finds the occasional acorn.
				__________________Send in the evil clowns.
 |  
	|   |  |  
	
	
		|  10-19-2009, 04:23 PM | #941 |  
	| Moderator 
				 
				Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Pop goes the chupacabra 
					Posts: 18,532
				      | 
				
				Re: Google Books Brouhaha
			 
 
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by LessinSF   |  It kind of discounts the value of the effort that Google went to to compile the database in the first place.  Putting aside the proposed monopoly over "orphan" works, which is a not insignificant problem, the reporter and the opposition seem to ignore the significant benefits Google's efforts would bring with quibbles about inaccurate metadata.  Someone else is free to go to the same effort.  Or, put differently, you get what you pay for.
				__________________[Dictated but not read]
 |  
	|   |  |  
	
	
		|  10-19-2009, 04:32 PM | #942 |  
	| Patch Diva 
				 
				Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Winter Wonderland 
					Posts: 4,607
				      | 
				
				Re: The sheer awesomeness does. Not. Stop.
			 
 
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Atticus Grinch   |  Poor Dan Brown.  He thought the Illuminati were just an anti-Vatican secret society.  Now we know they're the frontmen for the aliens.
 
ETA:  I just remembered "V" is coming back to TV.  Extraterrestrial shape-shifting aliens!!  Yeah!!!
				 Last edited by Fugee; 10-19-2009 at 04:44 PM..
 |  
	|   |  |  
	
	
		|  10-19-2009, 04:37 PM | #943 |  
	| Southern charmer 
				 
				Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: At the Great Altar of Passive Entertainment 
					Posts: 7,033
				      | 
				
				Re: The sheer awesomeness does. Not. Stop.
			 
 
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Atticus Grinch   |  Huh.  Shape Shifter's clearly older than I thought. |  
	|   |  |  
	
	
		|  10-19-2009, 04:37 PM | #944 |  
	| I am beyond a rank! 
				 
				Join Date: Mar 2003 
					Posts: 17,175
				      | 
				
				Re: Google Books Brouhaha
			 
 
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)  It kind of discounts the value of the effort that Google went to to compile the database in the first place. |  The momentum narrative is dripping with bias.
 
	Quote: 
	
		| Putting aside the proposed monopoly over "orphan" works, which is a not insignificant problem |  The odd thing is that this concern is really about the author's copyright, and the class action system, rather than anything Google did. |  
	|   |  |  
	
	
		|  10-19-2009, 04:52 PM | #945 |  
	| Hello, Dum-Dum. 
				 
				Join Date: Mar 2003 
					Posts: 10,117
				      | 
				
				Re: Google Books Brouhaha
			 
 
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Mmmm, Burger (C.J.)  Putting aside the proposed monopoly over "orphan" works |  As an utter ignoramus about antitrust, it seems to me the courts' complicity in allowing a market to be defined in this way is the real problem.  "Your Honor, your analysis should focus solely on whether Google has a controlling share of the market for . . . written works for which the acquisition cost approaches zero." |  
	|   |  |  
	
		|  |  |  
 
	| Thread Tools |  
	|  |  
	| Display Modes |  
	
	| 
		 Linear Mode |  
 
	| 
	|  Posting Rules |  
	| 
		
		You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts 
 HTML code is Off 
 |  |  |  
 
	
	
		
	
	
 |