| 
	
		
			
				|  » Site Navigation |  
	|  |  
	
		
			
				|  » Online Users: 220 |  
| 0 members and 220 guests |  
		| No Members online |  
		| Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 04:16 AM. |  | 
	
		|  |  |  
	
	
	
	
		|  10-26-2009, 07:39 PM | #1336 |  
	| Hello, Dum-Dum. 
				 
				Join Date: Mar 2003 
					Posts: 10,117
				      | 
				
				Re: Mrs. DTB
			 
 
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by tmdiva  I would say "Congratulations!", but aren't you supposed to say "Best wishes" to the bride, and "Congratulations" to the groom?  Where's DS/BRC when we need her?
 tm
 |  This is true, by which I mean it's true that you're not supposed to, because it's supposedly bad taste to imply that the bride has garnered something by getting her man.  Supposedly it comes off like "good job."  The fact that the rule did not apply equally to grooms is strong evidence it is obsolete.  What you are now congratulating is not the getting of a man, an event that probably preceded the wedding by some months or years anyway, but in the success of the ceremony rather than the success of the relationship.
 
I think the root of congratulations is something like "(I) rejoice with (you)," so all in all even honoring the existence of that superstition is more sour than the sentiment behind it.
 
ETA comparing it to "best wishes" shows it to be an even more odious double standard -- it basically implies that women are not the agents of their own destinies, but men are. The marriage came about because of the initiative of the man, who is to be congratulated, but the woman is merely offered a vague well-wishing that it turns out okay?  Now that I've thought about it, I am never honoring this tradition again.  And I do some crazy shit for auld lang syne.
				 Last edited by Atticus Grinch; 10-26-2009 at 07:47 PM..
 |  
	|   |  |  
	
	
		|  10-26-2009, 07:47 PM | #1337 |  
	| Quality not quantity 
				 
				Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Stumptown, USA 
					Posts: 1,344
				      | 
				
				Re: Mrs. DTB
			 
 
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Atticus Grinch  (feminist analysis of the manners of congratulating newlyweds) |  Be still my beating heart.  You'll always be my favorite.  
 
tm |  
	|   |  |  
	
	
		|  10-26-2009, 08:06 PM | #1338 |  
	| Registered User 
				 
				Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Government Yard in Trenchtown 
					Posts: 20,182
				      | 
				
				Re: Mrs. DTB
			 
 
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Atticus Grinch  This is true, by which I mean it's true that you're not supposed to, because it's supposedly bad taste to imply that the bride has garnered something by getting her man.  Supposedly it comes off like "good job."  The fact that the rule did not apply equally to grooms is strong evidence it is obsolete.  What you are now congratulating is not the getting of a man, an event that probably preceded the wedding by some months or years anyway, but in the success of the ceremony rather than the success of the relationship.
 I think the root of congratulations is something like "(I) rejoice with (you)," so all in all even honoring the existence of that superstition is more sour than the sentiment behind it.
 
 ETA comparing it to "best wishes" shows it to be an even more odious double standard -- it basically implies that women are not the agents of their own destinies, but men are. The marriage came about because of the initiative of the man, who is to be congratulated, but the woman is merely offered a vague well-wishing that it turns out okay?  Now that I've thought about it, I am never honoring this tradition again.  And I do some crazy shit for auld lang syne.
 |  Setting aside the rules and the politics behind them, though, don't you wish dtb the best, because this guy can't be good enough for her?  
 
And isn't this guy due his congratulations, because, hey, he married dtb?
				__________________A wee dram a day!
 |  
	|   |  |  
	
	
		|  10-26-2009, 09:01 PM | #1339 |  
	| Proud Holder-Post 200,000 
				 
				Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: Corner Office 
					Posts: 86,149
				      | 
				
				Re: Mrs. DTB
			 
 
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Atticus Grinch  This is true, by which I mean it's true that you're not supposed to, because it's supposedly bad taste to imply that the bride has garnered something by getting her man.  Supposedly it comes off like "good job."  The fact that the rule did not apply equally to grooms is strong evidence it is obsolete.  What you are now congratulating is not the getting of a man, an event that probably preceded the wedding by some months or years anyway, but in the success of the ceremony rather than the success of the relationship.
 I think the root of congratulations is something like "(I) rejoice with (you)," so all in all even honoring the existence of that superstition is more sour than the sentiment behind it.
 
 ETA comparing it to "best wishes" shows it to be an even more odious double standard -- it basically implies that women are not the agents of their own destinies, but men are. The marriage came about because of the initiative of the man, who is to be congratulated, but the woman is merely offered a vague well-wishing that it turns out okay?  Now that I've thought about it, I am never honoring this tradition again.  And I do some crazy shit for auld lang syne.
 |  the biggest lie told on these pages is when you said you weren't constipated. no offense.
				__________________I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts   |  
	|   |  |  
	
	
		|  10-26-2009, 09:03 PM | #1340 |  
	| I am beyond a rank! 
				 
				Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Appalaichan Trail 
					Posts: 6,201
				      | 
				
				Re: Mrs. DTB
			 
 
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Greedy,Greedy,Greedy  Setting aside the rules and the politics behind them, though, don't you wish dtb the best, because this guy can't be good enough for her?  
 And isn't this guy due his congratulations, because, hey, he married dtb?
 |  You are giving Atticus a run for his money, mister. |  
	|   |  |  
	
	
		|  10-26-2009, 09:32 PM | #1341 |  
	| Hello, Dum-Dum. 
				 
				Join Date: Mar 2003 
					Posts: 10,117
				      | 
				
				Re: Mrs. DTB
			 
 
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski  the biggest lie told on these pages is when you said you weren't constipated. no offense. |  My iPhone has a camera and I'm not afraid to use it. |  
	|   |  |  
	
	
		|  10-26-2009, 09:54 PM | #1342 |  
	| Proud Holder-Post 200,000 
				 
				Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: Corner Office 
					Posts: 86,149
				      | 
				
				Re: Mrs. DTB
			 
 
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by dtb  You are giving Atticus a run for his money, mister. |  careful. some of the a-listers are talking (or so I've heard  ) that we don't need Atticus, notbob and this new ggg.
 
ever read sophie's choice?
 
ps http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/24/ed...baby.html?_r=1
				__________________I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts  
				 Last edited by Hank Chinaski; 10-26-2009 at 10:25 PM..
 |  
	|   |  |  
	
	
		|  10-26-2009, 10:14 PM | #1343 |  
	| Wild Rumpus Facilitator 
				 
				Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: In a teeny, tiny, little office 
					Posts: 14,167
				      | 
				
				Re: Mrs. DTB
			 
 
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Atticus Grinch  This is true, by which I mean it's true that you're not supposed to, because it's supposedly bad taste to imply that the bride has garnered something by getting her man.  Supposedly it comes off like "good job."  The fact that the rule did not apply equally to grooms is strong evidence it is obsolete.  What you are now congratulating is not the getting of a man, an event that probably preceded the wedding by some months or years anyway, but in the success of the ceremony rather than the success of the relationship.
 I think the root of congratulations is something like "(I) rejoice with (you)," so all in all even honoring the existence of that superstition is more sour than the sentiment behind it.
 
 ETA comparing it to "best wishes" shows it to be an even more odious double standard -- it basically implies that women are not the agents of their own destinies, but men are. The marriage came about because of the initiative of the man, who is to be congratulated, but the woman is merely offered a vague well-wishing that it turns out okay?  Now that I've thought about it, I am never honoring this tradition again.  And I do some crazy shit for auld lang syne.
 |  Namaste.
				__________________Send in the evil clowns.
 |  
	|   |  |  
	
	
		|  10-26-2009, 11:41 PM | #1344 |  
	| Random Syndicate (admin) 
				 
				Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Romantically enfranchised 
					Posts: 14,281
				      | 
				
				Re: Mrs. DTB
			 
 
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by dtb  I know everyone was on tenterhooks awaiting this announcement, so let me end the suspense and let you all know that my nuptials were completed yesterday.  
 You can now call me (as some wag recently did) Mrs. Al Unser, Jr.
 |  Congratulations!!
				__________________"In the olden days before the internet, you'd take this sort of person for a ride out into the woods and shoot them, as Darwin intended, before he could spawn."--Will the Vampire People Leave the Lobby? pg 79
 
 |  
	|   |  |  
	
	
		|  10-27-2009, 01:24 AM | #1345 |  
	| Registered User 
				 
				Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Flyover land 
					Posts: 19,042
				      | 
				
				Re: Mrs. DTB
			 
 
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Replaced_Texan  Congratulations!! |  ditto.
				__________________I'm using lipstick again.
 |  
	|   |  |  
	
	
		|  10-27-2009, 07:46 AM | #1346 |  
	| Moderator 
				 
				Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Monty Capuletti's gazebo 
					Posts: 26,231
				      | 
				
				Re: Mrs. DTB
			 
 
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by dtb  I know everyone was on tenterhooks awaiting this announcement, so let me end the suspense and let you all know that my nuptials were completed yesterday.  
 You can now call me (as some wag recently did) Mrs. Al Unser, Jr.
 |  Hey, Congratulations!  I'm toasting you.  It's only coffee, but the sentiment's there. 
 
3 week honeymoon?
				__________________All is for the best in the best of all possible worlds.
 |  
	|   |  |  
	
	
		|  10-27-2009, 08:55 AM | #1347 |  
	| I am beyond a rank! 
				 
				Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Appalaichan Trail 
					Posts: 6,201
				      | 
				
				Re: Mrs. DTB
			 
 
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by sebastian_dangerfield  Hey, Congratulations!  I'm toasting you.  It's only coffee, but the sentiment's there. 
 3 week honeymoon?
 |  I wish -- but, alas, we already have a bunch of kids, who are in school, so the honeymoon was in August.  Besides -- what's a honeymoon without a lot of boozing?
 
Thank you for your kind toast (with your coffee).  And thanks to everyone for your congratulations.  I'm still in the perma-grin phase. |  
	|   |  |  
	
	
		|  10-27-2009, 10:31 AM | #1348 |  
	| Registered User 
				 
				Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Throwing a kettle over a pub 
					Posts: 14,753
				      | 
				
				Re: Actual Fashion Question
			 
 
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by sebastian_dangerfield  If you're nuts, Borellis, Brionis or Kitons are really fucking sweet.  But that's out of my tax bracket. |  These brands make no sense to me.  Can't you have shirts hand-tailored for you for less than you'll pay for one of these?
				__________________No no no, that's not gonna help. That's not gonna help and I'll tell you why: It doesn't unbang your Mom.
 |  
	|   |  |  
	
	
		|  10-27-2009, 10:32 AM | #1349 |  
	| Registered User 
				 
				Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Throwing a kettle over a pub 
					Posts: 14,753
				      | 
				
				Re: Mrs. DTB
			 
 
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by dtb  I know everyone was on tenterhooks awaiting this announcement, so let me end the suspense and let you all know that my nuptials were completed yesterday.  
 You can now call me (as some wag recently did) Mrs. Al Unser, Jr.
 |  Congrats!
 
What's a tenterhook?
				__________________No no no, that's not gonna help. That's not gonna help and I'll tell you why: It doesn't unbang your Mom.
 |  
	|   |  |  
	
	
		|  10-27-2009, 10:42 AM | #1350 |  
	| [intentionally omitted] 
				 
				Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: NYC 
					Posts: 18,597
				      | 
				
				Re: Mrs. DTB
			 
 
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Greedy,Greedy,Greedy  Setting aside the rules and the politics behind them, though, don't you wish dtb the best, because this guy can't be good enough for her?  
 And isn't this guy due his congratulations, because, hey, he married dtb?
 |   Enough already.
 
TM |  
	|   |  |  
	
		|  |  |  
 
	| Thread Tools |  
	|  |  
	| Display Modes |  
	
	| 
		 Linear Mode |  
 
	| 
	|  Posting Rules |  
	| 
		
		You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts 
 HTML code is Off 
 |  |  |  
 
	
	
		
	
	
 |