LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers > General Discussion > Politics

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 2,076
0 members and 2,076 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-05-2020, 11:59 AM   #1
Adder
I am beyond a rank!
 
Adder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 17,178
Re: Objectively intelligent.

Quote:
Originally Posted by sebastian_dangerfield View Post
This is why you lose elections. People care about the economy, jobs, and health care.

Most people are not as far up Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs as you and I and everyone else here. They don't give a fuck about impeachment (most are too dim to even understand it). They don't care about Ukraine. They don't care about Epstein, or Schiff, or Nadler. They see the thing as a giant waste of time.
Who do you think the intended audience for this was?
Adder is offline  
Old 02-05-2020, 01:50 PM   #2
sebastian_dangerfield
Moderator
 
sebastian_dangerfield's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Monty Capuletti's gazebo
Posts: 26,231
Re: Objectively intelligent.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Adder View Post
Who do you think the intended audience for this was?
People deciding between a moderate Democrat like Buttigieg or Biden and Trump. They are the only voters up for grabs.
__________________
All is for the best in the best of all possible worlds.
sebastian_dangerfield is offline  
Old 02-05-2020, 04:35 PM   #3
Adder
I am beyond a rank!
 
Adder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 17,178
Re: Objectively intelligent.

Quote:
Originally Posted by sebastian_dangerfield View Post
People deciding between a moderate Democrat like Buttigieg or Biden and Trump. They are the only voters up for grabs.
Yeah, that's not it.

ETA: Here's a hint: do you think those swing voters know Epstein and his significance on sight?
Adder is offline  
Old 02-05-2020, 04:38 PM   #4
sebastian_dangerfield
Moderator
 
sebastian_dangerfield's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Monty Capuletti's gazebo
Posts: 26,231
Re: Objectively intelligent.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Adder View Post
Yeah, that's not it.

ETA: Here's a hint: do you think those swing voters know Epstein and his significance on sight?
Who else is up for grabs, and how will this ad bring them over to a D?
__________________
All is for the best in the best of all possible worlds.
sebastian_dangerfield is offline  
Old 02-05-2020, 05:59 PM   #5
Hank Chinaski
Proud Holder-Post 200,000
 
Hank Chinaski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Corner Office
Posts: 86,150
Re: Objectively intelligent.

Quote:
Originally Posted by sebastian_dangerfield View Post
Who else is up for grabs, and how will this ad bring them over to a D?
I’ve shown you the math about 3rd party votes. A goal of this ad is to convince this ain’t a time to play games again. Your better point might be does it alienate swing votes?
__________________
I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts

Last edited by Hank Chinaski; 02-05-2020 at 06:22 PM..
Hank Chinaski is offline  
Old 02-05-2020, 06:48 PM   #6
sebastian_dangerfield
Moderator
 
sebastian_dangerfield's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Monty Capuletti's gazebo
Posts: 26,231
Re: Objectively intelligent.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski View Post
I’ve shown you the math about 3rd party votes. A goal of this ad is to convince this ain’t a time to play games again. Your better point might be does it alienate swing votes?
The third party voter this time around is a Bernie Bro. Or someone like me, who isn’t swayed at all by this ad. I’m more inclined by this ad to see a straight up power game, quite honestly. I remain unswayed that we are in an existential crisis. I see a clown accidentally causing the curtain to be pulled back and the power game to seen in stark relief.

I think the real fear among those claiming concern Trump is an existential threat is that the stabilized system that has held together a system that delivered predictably for them is now shown to be bankrupt and designed to funnel money upward to professional classes like us at cost to those below. Between Bernie and Trump, they’ve shown neoliberal economics practiced by both right and left does not value or care about the success of the middle.

The little guy is learning how we of the top 10% have directed all the gravy to ourselves.

Your harping on 3rd patty voters is infused with a lot of self interest. Some see opportunity in change, in entropy. So please, don’t bullshit about this or any other time not being one in which to take chances. (I realize you’re not making that explicit point, but commenting that it’s the point of the ad. But you have made that point endlessly since 2016.)

ETA: I’m sympathetic, by the way. Keeping a status quo that delivers for the top 1-20% at cost of higher taxes to placate those losing out below is usually a good bet. You make far more on the gains accruing to asset holders than the taxes you pay to keep those rendered redundant by the trade policies and tech that delivers for you displaces. And you get to say you favor safety nets and you pay your “fair share.” And when the losers complain, you can tell them Adam Smith says that, while they’re fucked, their grandkids will enjoy the jobs of the future!

You know why so many middle class voters embrace Bernie and Trump? Neither is slow playing them. Trump’s actually been crazy enough to try to keep his promises, and Bernie’s admitting the middle is so fucked it needs democratic socialism. We who tsk tsk about how we need a sensible moderate like Joe are very obviously stating, “we want to keep our franchise, at the top.”

I don’t think the real middle class person is nonplussed about Trump. I think the somewhat affluent but still-has-to-work person who benefited from prior economic policies, particularly trade, is the person who’s exercised here.
__________________
All is for the best in the best of all possible worlds.

Last edited by sebastian_dangerfield; 02-05-2020 at 07:25 PM..
sebastian_dangerfield is offline  
Old 02-05-2020, 07:28 PM   #7
Hank Chinaski
Proud Holder-Post 200,000
 
Hank Chinaski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Corner Office
Posts: 86,150
Re: Objectively intelligent.

Quote:
Originally Posted by sebastian_dangerfield View Post
The third party voter this time around is a Bernie Bro. Or someone like me, who isn’t swayed at all by this ad. I’m more inclined by this ad to see a straight up power game, quite honestly. I remain unswayed that we are in an existential crisis. I see a clown accidentally causing the curtain to be pulled back and the power game to seen in stark relief.

I think the real fear among those claiming concern Trump is an existential threat is that the stabilized system that has held together a system that delivered predictably for them is now shown to be bankrupt and designed to funnel money upward to professional classes like us at cost to those below. Between Bernie and Trump, they’ve shown neoliberal economics practiced by both right and left does not value or care about the success of the middle.

The little guy is learning how we of the top 10% have directed all the gravy to ourselves.

Your harping on 3rd patty voters is infused with a lot of self interest. Some see opportunity in change, in entropy. So please, don’t bullshit about this or any other time not being one in which to take chances. (I realize you’re not making that explicit point, but commenting that it’s the point of the ad. But you have made that point endlessly since 2016.)

ETA: I’m sympathetic, by the way. Keeping a status quo that delivers for the top 1-20% at cost of higher taxes to placate those losing out below is usually a good bet. You make far more on the gains accruing to asset holders than the taxes you pay to keep those rendered redundant by the trade policies and tech that delivers for you displaces. And you get to say you favor safety nets and you pay your “fair share.” And when the losers complain, you can tell them Adam Smith says that, while they’re fucked, their grandkids will enjoy the jobs of the future!

You know why so many middle class voters embrace Bernie and Trump? Neither is slow playing them. Trump’s actually been crazy enough to try to keep his promises, and Bernie’s admitting the middle is so fucked it needs democratic socialism. We who tsk tsk about how we need a sensible moderate like Joe are very obviously stating, “we want to keep our franchise, at the top.”

I don’t think the real middle class person is nonplussed about Trump. I think the somewhat affluent but still-has-to-work person who benefited from prior economic policies, particularly trade, is the person who’s exercised here.
No mas
__________________
I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts
Hank Chinaski is offline  
Old 02-05-2020, 04:44 PM   #8
Tyrone Slothrop
Moderasaurus Rex
 
Tyrone Slothrop's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 33,084
Re: Objectively intelligent.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Adder View Post
Yeah, that's not it.

ETA: Here's a hint: do you think those swing voters know Epstein and his significance on sight?
Or Khashoggi walking into the Saudi consulate?
__________________
“It was fortunate that so few men acted according to moral principle, because it was so easy to get principles wrong, and a determined person acting on mistaken principles could really do some damage." - Larissa MacFarquhar
Tyrone Slothrop is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:31 PM.