LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers > General Discussion > The Fashionable

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 133
0 members and 133 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 11-05-2004, 01:20 AM   #11
Replaced_Texan
Random Syndicate (admin)
 
Replaced_Texan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Romantically enfranchised
Posts: 14,281
Settle a bet with a feisty coworker.

Quote:
Originally posted by Atticus Grinch
I can't reconcile this. If a semicolon is the appropriate punctuation, it's a run-on sentence, no?

My feisty coworker was telling me that it's not a run-on because there is an implied "because." I told em that I was unaware of the "implied because" doctrine that excuses run-on sentences. Em is otherwise very bright (hi, em!) but, bitch, please --- "implied because"?
My thought is that yes, it is a run-on if "careful" is an independent clause. I can see an argument that it is a dependent clause, but I think it stands on its own. "Implied because" is silly, and fiesty co-worker should be bitchslapped with a grammar text for even suggesting such a thing.

But then I always thought that there should have been a colon in "Buffy the Vampire Slayer." I lost that battle.
__________________
"In the olden days before the internet, you'd take this sort of person for a ride out into the woods and shoot them, as Darwin intended, before he could spawn."--Will the Vampire People Leave the Lobby? pg 79
Replaced_Texan is offline  
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:15 AM.