LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers > General Discussion > Politics

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 166
0 members and 166 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 05:16 AM.
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 11-01-2005, 08:40 PM   #11
Spanky
For what it's worth
 
Spanky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: With Thumper
Posts: 6,793
Republican Majority for Choice's position (non-position) on Alito

Quote:
Originally posted by Sexual Harassment Panda
Maybe you can help me out here. Miers was the nominee because the SCOTUS could benefit from having someone who was unpolluted by judicial experience, and could bring an outsider's perspective to the bench. Alito could not be more of a judicial insider if he tried. Why is this now a good thing ?
I hope you are not asking me (even though you quoted me) because I have no idea. I thought the quote from the RMC was pretty funny because it didn't really say anything. NCS seemed to agree with it but there didn't seem to be any substantive points to agree with.

As usual things are flying over my head.
Spanky is offline  
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:06 PM.