Quote:
Originally posted by ltl/fb
Even if you had a full-length spreadeagle shot of her in your wallet, it would not help you post it, so I don't see what the relevance of having photographs of nude sex partners in one's wallet is. Also, as previously discussed as a general matter I don't find male genitals aesthetically pleasing. I believe in the murky past I once said something like "I wouldn't put it up on the mantel as a decoration" but that might have been Sidd. And I am shocked, SHOCKED that you would marry someone whose attitudes about nudity are so parchial. Whatever parchial is.
And $25k is way overpricing. I'd think one of the few places you could keep a penis on screen for a 30-second stretch would be some kind of porn channel, and he'd need to do more than display his penis to get paid much of anything, let alone into 5 figures.
|
1. If I had the photo, I could post it. Of course, I'd be risking my career by hijacking the scanner for such prurient purposes...
2. My wife's views on nudity are not at all parochial, Timothy. I merely noted that she'd probably not be thrilled that I was taking "action shots" of her walking about the home nude. I can sympathize because I'd prefer to be fluffed before such a shoot, rather than shot on the sly. I need proper make up.
3. I can do both "cabbage" and "the flying squirrel."
Threaded Mode