Fashion Board 1-08-04 through 02-03-04

[ltl/fb]

Originally posted by Jack Manfred
It's not wrong to do a sexy cover version of "Rubber Duckie" is it?

Not if your personal rubber duckie requires batteries: http://www.goodvibes.com/cgi-bin/sgi...EQC=3&TRAN85=N



(spree -- it's a link to a site that sells sex toys and videos; it's pretty mild but has stuff like the phrases "anal safe" and "harness compatible" (with bonus explanatory picture!)) (the duck is neither anal safe nor harness compatible, alas) (nor does it feature "female-penetrating-male scene" which I would suppose applies to videos, not toys)