We are all Slave now.

[Greedy,Greedy,Greedy]

Originally Posted by Replaced_Texan

I gotta give her credit for associating his penis with fungus without at all implying venereal disease.



I'm now living with the non-zero chance that he will whip it out to prove her wrong. Probably on that stupid Presidential alert so we all get it.

But that would likely prove her right, wouldn't it?

I suspect we'll get a "fake pubes" picture instead.

[Hank Chinaski]

Originally Posted by Replaced_Texan

I gotta give her credit for associating his penis with fungus without at all implying venereal disease.



I'm now living with the non-zero chance that he will whip it out to prove her wrong. Probably on that stupid Presidential alert so we all get it.

What are Yeti pubes?

[Hank Chinaski]

Originally Posted by Greedy,Greedy,Greedy

Yup.

Did Anita Hill get attacked personally beyond the truth of her allegations, or just called a liar?

[Replaced_Texan]

Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski

What are Yeti pubes?

I am guessing that has nothing to do with the cooler.

I imagine that both the Nintendo and Yeti marketing/crisis people are meeting right now.

[Greedy,Greedy,Greedy]

Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski

Did Anita Hill get attacked personally beyond the truth of her allegations, or just called a liar?

My recollection was there were not just the kind of ugly comments being made now about Prof. Ford, but that there continued to be attacks on her for years afterwards, including by Clarence Thomas in a book he wrote.

But that is my unaided recollection, counselor, and if you'd like a better answer, I'd recommend to you a program called "google".

[Tyrone Slothrop]

Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski

Did Anita Hill get attacked personally beyond the truth of her allegations, or just called a liar?

Seriously? She was smeared as nutty and slutty.

[Replaced_Texan]

Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski

Did Anita Hill get attacked personally beyond the truth of her allegations, or just called a liar?

This is how they did it, as told by one of the people who did it.

[Greedy,Greedy,Greedy]

Originally Posted by Replaced_Texan

This is how they did it, as told by one of the people who did it.

That is an amazing confession. Wow.

[Not Bob]

Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski

Did Anita Hill get attacked personally beyond the truth of her allegations, or just called a liar?

She was famously tagged as being “a little bit nutty and a little bit slutty” in (IIRC) American Spectator magazine by David Brock. So, I’d say yes.

ETA: Too slow, Not Bob, too slow.

[Hank Chinaski]

Originally Posted by Tyrone Slothrop

Seriously? She was smeared as nutty and slutty.

Don't recollect. But okay. i mean I also never read American Spectator (other than at my barber but that is a moth story I just remembered), and I am just remembering the news- at the time the world wasn't fragmented into "your news/my news" and American Spectator was pretty clearly whacko land.

[Greedy,Greedy,Greedy]

Originally Posted by Not Bob

She was famously tagged as being “a little bit nutty and a little bit slutty” in (IIRC) American Spectator magazine by David Brock. So, I’d say yes.

ETA: Too slow, Not Bob, too slow.

We really ought to call the next board, if we make it that far, "Nutty and Slutty". I think we'd wear that sobriquet well.

[sebastian_dangerfield]

Originally Posted by Replaced_Texan

I gotta give her credit for associating his penis with fungus without at all implying venereal disease.



I'm now living with the non-zero chance that he will whip it out to prove her wrong. Probably on that stupid Presidential alert so we all get it.

I've read and seen many things that I later regretted seeing and reading. This article ranks at the top of them, including ISIS videos and car accidents I've passed on the highway.

[sebastian_dangerfield]

Originally Posted by Tyrone Slothrop

Seriously? She was smeared as nutty and slutty.

They both have to testify Monday or this thing looks like a delay tactic. Don’t argue with me about whether it’s fair or not. The accusation is six weeks’ old, at least. She risks loss of credibility if he’s there Monday and she’s asking the FBI to vet a 36 year old story.

This is war. This is how it’s done. Unless you can tell me how delay benefits the effort to tank this guy, I think she needs to be on a plane to DC. If he’s there and she isn’t, opposition loses loses Flake, Corker, and any hope of anti-Trump GOP cooperation. Which the Ds need here.

[Pretty Little Flower]

Originally Posted by sebastian_dangerfield

They both have to testify Monday or this thing looks like a delay tactic. Don’t argue with me about whether it’s fair or not. The accusation is six weeks’ old, at least. She risks loss of credibility if he’s there Monday and she’s asking the FBI to vet a 36 year old story.

This is war. This is how it’s done. Unless you can tell me how delay benefits the effort to tank this guy, I think she needs to be on a plane to DC. If he’s there and she isn’t, opposition loses loses Flake, Corker, and any hope of anti-Trump GOP cooperation. Which the Ds need here.

Why are we supposed to be convinced that you have any credibility in predicting the future when you can't even get the past right?

[sebastian_dangerfield]

Originally Posted by Pretty Little Flower

Why are we supposed to be convinced that you have any credibility in predicting the future when you can't even get the past right?

You aren’t. If the logic isn’t compelling, ignore me.