Keeping it civil instead of returning to our dark ways

[ltl/fb]

Originally posted by ilikenewsocks

There are a couple obvious explanations for the differences: People who voted for Kerry are more public spirited, share-the-information type people and a lot of people were embarrassed to say out loud that they voted for Bush.

This can be translated as "I don't think there was a conspiracy that is revealed by exit polls"

[SlaveNoMore]

ltl/fb
I need an unmarried, unattractive cow avatar.

eta: Was her marriage invalidated? I cannot recall.

[ltl/fb]

Originally posted by SlaveNoMore


eta: Was her marriage invalidated? I cannot recall.

whatever that picture is, it does not show up on my computer -- my firm is filtering it out.

oh -- rosie -- I'm not a lesbian and she wants/wanted kids. so not a good one.

I want a moo cow picture.

[Shape Shifter]

Originally posted by ilikenewsocks
How do MJ and LeBron fit into all this?

23 Skidoo!

[Hank Chinaski]

Originally posted by ltl/fb
whatever that picture is, it does not show up on my computer -- my firm is filtering it out.

oh -- rosie -- I'm not a lesbian and she wants/wanted kids. so not a good one.

I want a moo cow picture.

[Shape Shifter]

Originally posted by ltl/fb
There are a couple obvious explanations for the differences: People who voted for Kerry are more public spirited, share-the-information type people and a lot of people were embarrassed to say out loud that they voted for Bush.

This can be translated as "I don't think there was a conspiracy that is revealed by exit polls"

2, to the extent that it was not revealed by the exit polls.

[ltl/fb]

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski

resize that and I'm all over it.

[Hank Chinaski]

Originally posted by ltl/fb
resize that and I'm all over it.

i can't even spell, do you really think I can resize?

[Bad_Rich_Chic]

Originally posted by sgtclub
Is your question why is this within the SEC's purview?

Yes, if the relevant prohibitions are house/senate rules, not the SEC regs.

[Sidd Finch]

Originally posted by ltl/fb
I agree with you, I think, and am uh confused about Sidd's concern about the addictiveness of pot, and how it's a slippery slope from that to other harder drugs. (a) I thought the whole pot argument was that it isn't even as addictive as cigarettes, and (ii) if they see that mom and dad smoke pot, but don't do other harder drugs, they are more likely to see a line between pot and the more damaging, addictive drugs than than if pot were lumped in with cocaine and meth as "bad illegal horrible" things.

Sidd's sounding a lot like that guy who wrote the sins book.*



*the one who then got caught gambling or whatever

I have not once said that pot "leads to addiction." Excessive drug use -- any sort of drug -- is risky. Young kids are susceptible to losing control.

You asked why parents would be more concerned using drugs around their kids than drinking. I answered. I didn't suggest that we debate the issue. Your insistence on debating something with which you have no experience whatsoever, and no direct knowledge, is asinine.

Do you realize that using drugs around your kids can lead to LOSING your kids? Simple casual use. Do you understand that this is not an issue with alcohol? Or by recognizing this potential danger am I being Bill Bennett?

Feel free to raise your kids however you want, you stupid twat. And, while you're at it, next time you are at a party where there are kids present, turn down a beer and light up a joint and see how that works for you.

[robustpuppy]

Originally posted by Hank Chinaski
i can't even spell, do you really think I can resize?

This was very cute.

[Sidd Finch]

Originally posted by ltl/fb
I don't think they're foolable. Just for the record. But I would think that them seeing you smoking pot could be treated as them catching you with your hand down your husband's pants, or having sex, or whatever. It's private, it's an adult thing, and it's not appropriate to talk about in public.

It's not appropriate to fart in public and little kids do that all the time too.

Christ you are stupid. You compare me to fucking Ashcroft because I think that getting stoned in front of my four-year-old son is a bad idea, but drinking a glass of wine in front of him is ok?

Crawl back into your fucking hole.

[Sidd Finch]

Originally posted by ltl/fb
I need an unmarried, unattractive cow avatar.

Why not just post a photo?

[ltl/fb]

Originally posted by Sidd Finch
I have not once said that pot "leads to addiction." Excessive drug use -- any sort of drug -- is risky. Young kids are susceptible to losing control.

You asked why parents would be more concerned using drugs around their kids than drinking. I answered. I didn't suggest that we debate the issue. Your insistence on debating something with which you have no experience whatsoever, and no direct knowledge, is asinine.

Do you realize that using drugs around your kids can lead to LOSING your kids? Simple casual use. Do you understand that this is not an issue with alcohol? Or by recognizing this potential danger am I being Bill Bennett?

Feel free to raise your kids however you want, you stupid twat. And, while you're at it, next time you are at a party where there are kids present, turn down a beer and light up a joint and see how that works for you.

I don't drink beer or smoke anything. It's interesting how your attitudes do a total 180. Funny.

So how do you feel about taking one of your kids along when you cheat on the other parent? Good? Bad? Will they buy that you are just friends?

[ltl/fb]

Originally posted by Sidd Finch
Crawl back into your fucking hole.

Your hole seems to be sealed quite tightly shut. I am concerned for your health.