LawTalkers  

Go Back   LawTalkers > General Discussion > Politics

» Site Navigation
 > FAQ
» Online Users: 1,297
0 members and 1,297 guests
No Members online
Most users ever online was 9,654, 05-18-2025 at 04:16 AM.
Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-05-2020, 06:58 PM   #3691
SEC_Chick
I am beyond a rank!
 
SEC_Chick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: A pool of my own vomit
Posts: 734
Re: Objectively intelligent.

I’m just throwing this out here, but I think that if Biden had come out forcefully against court packing at the beginning, he would have done better in swing states.
SEC_Chick is offline  
Old 11-05-2020, 06:58 PM   #3692
sebastian_dangerfield
Moderator
 
sebastian_dangerfield's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Monty Capuletti's gazebo
Posts: 26,231
Re: Objectively intelligent.

Quote:
Originally Posted by SEC_Chick View Post
The main problem is that Trump won't give a speech like Gore did when he conceded (which I read today and almost got weepy), because it is not in his interest to do so. He cares nothing for the party or institutions, and whatever his plan is for the future (probably Trump TV) its success depends greatly on him making sure people are disaffected and will go with him to wherever that is so he can keep on grifting with his MAGA shot glasses and fake $1000 bills and 800% matches.

The chances that the nominee in 2024 will be an actual member of the Trump family (probably Jr.) are about 1000% that of a Never Trumper, or even mild critic. I was really disappointed to see Nicki Haley today effusively congratulate the new Q-Anon members of Congress. But she has made a cold calculation as to where the future lies.
He’s going to be the shadow president for his base, a Pope Benedict, if Benedict were Tweeting all day and night between golf games, whacked out of his mind on Adderall and weekly McDonald’s-induced mini-strokes.

ETA: He’s going to OAN. He’ll be their Bill O’Reilly on steroids. Unless Murdoch or Sinclair can offer him a better deal.
__________________
All is for the best in the best of all possible worlds.

Last edited by sebastian_dangerfield; 11-05-2020 at 07:03 PM..
sebastian_dangerfield is offline  
Old 11-05-2020, 07:07 PM   #3693
sebastian_dangerfield
Moderator
 
sebastian_dangerfield's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Monty Capuletti's gazebo
Posts: 26,231
Re: Objectively intelligent.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tyrone Slothrop View Post
So much of Trump's appeal is personal and sui genesis. I just don't think that Don Jr. or Nikki Haley can do it the way he does.
We rejected Bush and Clinton dynasties. And rid ourselves of the Kennedys (with help from the Kennedys themselves). We are not going to have an Outer Borough Camelot emerge from the train wreck that is Trump family genetics.
__________________
All is for the best in the best of all possible worlds.
sebastian_dangerfield is offline  
Old 11-05-2020, 07:07 PM   #3694
Hank Chinaski
Proud Holder-Post 200,000
 
Hank Chinaski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Corner Office
Posts: 86,147
Re: Objectively intelligent.

Quote:
Originally Posted by sebastian_dangerfield View Post
He’s going to be the shadow president for his base, a Pope Benedict, if Benedict were Tweeting all day and night between golf games, whacked out of his mind on Adderall and weekly McDonald’s-induced mini-strokes.

ETA: He’s going to OAN. He’ll be their Bill O’Reilly on steroids. Unless Murdoch or Sinclair can offer him a better deal.
He's going to need to take time off and find a new Eastern European wife soon. I think Melania is over 50?
__________________
I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts
Hank Chinaski is offline  
Old 11-05-2020, 07:24 PM   #3695
Pretty Little Flower
Moderator
 
Pretty Little Flower's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Flower
Posts: 8,434
Re: Objectively intelligent.

Quote:
Originally Posted by SEC_Chick View Post
I’m just throwing this out here, but I think that if Biden had come out forcefully against court packing at the beginning, he would have done better in swing states.
Can you tell me why Barrett was not the same as Garland? I have not heard a good explanation for that but I’m sure you can enlighten me.
__________________
Inside every man lives the seed of a flower.
If he looks within he finds beauty and power.

I am not sorry.
Pretty Little Flower is offline  
Old 11-05-2020, 07:42 PM   #3696
SEC_Chick
I am beyond a rank!
 
SEC_Chick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: A pool of my own vomit
Posts: 734
Re: Objectively intelligent.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pretty Little Flower View Post
Can you tell me why Barrett was not the same as Garland? I have not heard a good explanation for that but I’m sure you can enlighten me.
Basically the R Senators are smarmy hypocritical dbags. I cannot in good faith put forward an acceptable rationale for that.

McConnell rationalized it with the fact that Trump and the Senate were both GOP, and that was a different fact pattern, but no one was putting on those restrictions 4 years ago.

And for even the most Trump skeptical, Barrett is a favorite. I like her far better than Kavanaugh, and plenty of people wanted revenge for how BK was treated in his confirmation process. I mean, for people who have been tolerating Trump for the exceedingly rare wins, this was a big one.

I love her, but don’t necessarily think it was worth it unless you’re an LOL nothing matters nihilist.
SEC_Chick is offline  
Old 11-05-2020, 08:28 PM   #3697
Pretty Little Flower
Moderator
 
Pretty Little Flower's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Flower
Posts: 8,434
Re: Objectively intelligent.

Quote:
Originally Posted by SEC_Chick View Post
Basically the R Senators are smarmy hypocritical dbags. I cannot in good faith put forward an acceptable rationale for that.

McConnell rationalized it with the fact that Trump and the Senate were both GOP, and that was a different fact pattern, but no one was putting on those restrictions 4 years ago.

And for even the most Trump skeptical, Barrett is a favorite. I like her far better than Kavanaugh, and plenty of people wanted revenge for how BK was treated in his confirmation process. I mean, for people who have been tolerating Trump for the exceedingly rare wins, this was a big one.

I love her, but don’t necessarily think it was worth it unless you’re an LOL nothing matters nihilist.
You got the Justice you wanted but don’t like how it happened. Fair enough.
__________________
Inside every man lives the seed of a flower.
If he looks within he finds beauty and power.

I am not sorry.
Pretty Little Flower is offline  
Old 11-05-2020, 09:12 PM   #3698
sebastian_dangerfield
Moderator
 
sebastian_dangerfield's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Monty Capuletti's gazebo
Posts: 26,231
Re: Objectively intelligent.

Quote:
Originally Posted by SEC_Chick View Post
I’m just throwing this out here, but I think that if Biden had come out forcefully against court packing at the beginning, he would have done better in swing states.
You think too highly of swing state voters.

The oil industry comment by Biden in the second debate cost him a ton in PA and OH.

Rust belt voters are all pocketbook. Because they need one. SCOTUS is an affluent person’s concern, or the fixation of religious folks. The Rust Belt’s seen enough to have grasped that there is no man in the sky.
__________________
All is for the best in the best of all possible worlds.
sebastian_dangerfield is offline  
Old 11-05-2020, 09:15 PM   #3699
sebastian_dangerfield
Moderator
 
sebastian_dangerfield's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Monty Capuletti's gazebo
Posts: 26,231
Re: Objectively intelligent.

Quote:
Originally Posted by SEC_Chick View Post
Basically the R Senators are smarmy hypocritical dbags. I cannot in good faith put forward an acceptable rationale for that.

McConnell rationalized it with the fact that Trump and the Senate were both GOP, and that was a different fact pattern, but no one was putting on those restrictions 4 years ago.

And for even the most Trump skeptical, Barrett is a favorite. I like her far better than Kavanaugh, and plenty of people wanted revenge for how BK was treated in his confirmation process. I mean, for people who have been tolerating Trump for the exceedingly rare wins, this was a big one.

I love her, but don’t necessarily think it was worth it unless you’re an LOL nothing matters nihilist.
I like BK more than her. Gimme the transactional all day. Folks with creeds, and strange ones, are kamikazes.
__________________
All is for the best in the best of all possible worlds.
sebastian_dangerfield is offline  
Old 11-05-2020, 09:27 PM   #3700
sebastian_dangerfield
Moderator
 
sebastian_dangerfield's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Monty Capuletti's gazebo
Posts: 26,231
Re: Objectively intelligent.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski View Post
He's going to need to take time off and find a new Eastern European wife soon. I think Melania is over 50?
He can’t. He’s the strangest rich kid who’s ever lived. His old man must’ve been a seriously emotionally abuse fuck to have created this guy.

They’re so clueless. They thought this was a coronation of a new royal family.

Buy a compound near the Kennedys and start drinking, Don. It’s been a good run. Let your dipshit kids handle the endless restructurings to come.
__________________
All is for the best in the best of all possible worlds.
sebastian_dangerfield is offline  
Old 11-05-2020, 10:14 PM   #3701
Hank Chinaski
Proud Holder-Post 200,000
 
Hank Chinaski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Corner Office
Posts: 86,147
Re: Objectively intelligent.

Quote:
Originally Posted by sebastian_dangerfield View Post
He can’t. He’s the strangest rich kid who’s ever lived. His old man must’ve been a seriously emotionally abuse fuck to have created this guy.

They’re so clueless. They thought this was a coronation of a new royal family.

Buy a compound near the Kennedys and start drinking, Don. It’s been a good run. Let your dipshit kids handle the endless restructurings to come.
He doesn’t drink. Scotch was Nixon’s out when he knew he had to leave, but D can’t fall back on it.
__________________
I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts
Hank Chinaski is offline  
Old 11-05-2020, 10:28 PM   #3702
sebastian_dangerfield
Moderator
 
sebastian_dangerfield's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Monty Capuletti's gazebo
Posts: 26,231
Re: Objectively intelligent.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski View Post
He doesn’t drink. Scotch was Nixon’s out when he knew he had to leave, but D can’t fall back on it.
That’s the point. He needs to take up mind alternate. Who’s mind is more worthy, more likely to be improved for the exercise, than his?
__________________
All is for the best in the best of all possible worlds.
sebastian_dangerfield is offline  
Old 11-06-2020, 05:19 AM   #3703
Hank Chinaski
Proud Holder-Post 200,000
 
Hank Chinaski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Corner Office
Posts: 86,147
Re: Objectively intelligent.

Biden now ahead in Ga.
__________________
I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts
Hank Chinaski is offline  
Old 11-06-2020, 10:14 AM   #3704
Pretty Little Flower
Moderator
 
Pretty Little Flower's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Flower
Posts: 8,434
Re: Objectively intelligent.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hank Chinaski View Post
Biden now ahead in Ga.
While the initial delays in getting votes counted and calling states were anxiety-provoking, I am now enjoying the fact that the process is being drawn out. It is like that part of the EDM song where the tension and excitement is slowly building and building toward the inevitable drop.
__________________
Inside every man lives the seed of a flower.
If he looks within he finds beauty and power.

I am not sorry.
Pretty Little Flower is offline  
Old 11-06-2020, 10:53 AM   #3705
Hank Chinaski
Proud Holder-Post 200,000
 
Hank Chinaski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Corner Office
Posts: 86,147
Re: Objectively intelligent.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pretty Little Flower View Post
While the initial delays in getting votes counted and calling states were anxiety-provoking, I am now enjoying the fact that the process is being drawn out. It is like that part of the EDM song where the tension and excitement is slowly building and building toward the inevitable drop.
I dunno, I thought the President made some good points last night.
__________________
I will not suffer a fool- but I do seem to read a lot of their posts
Hank Chinaski is offline  
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:44 AM.